2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2009.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using classification trees to study the effects of fisheries management plans on the yield of Merluccius merluccius (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Alboran Sea (Western Mediterranean)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning, and more specifically regression and classification trees, have been scarcely used in fisheries (e.g. Mendoza et al 2010, Pérez-Ortiz et al 2013. However, this approach has shown a clear advantage over traditional multivariate methods or GLM/ GAM approaches, mainly because the resulting trees are by themselves explicative models of the relationship between the predictors and the response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Machine learning, and more specifically regression and classification trees, have been scarcely used in fisheries (e.g. Mendoza et al 2010, Pérez-Ortiz et al 2013. However, this approach has shown a clear advantage over traditional multivariate methods or GLM/ GAM approaches, mainly because the resulting trees are by themselves explicative models of the relationship between the predictors and the response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study therefore proposes a new approach to analysing the impact of fishing, using in addition a novel methodological approach from the machine learning field. Regression trees allow for the recognition of patterns in data (Mendoza et al 2010, Davidson et al 2012. Here, these patterns are the combinations of technical, environmental and geographical factors that increase the fishing impact on cartilaginous fish in southeastern Spain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since their introduction to the scientific community (Quinlan, 1979, 1986; Breiman et al ., 1984) and their first applications in ecology (e.g. Kompare et al ., 1994), decision trees have successfully been applied for solving various problems, such as predicting algal blooms (Kompare et al ., 1994; Džeroski, 2001), analysing impacts of exotic species on ecosystems (Everaert et al ., 2011; Boets, Lock & Goethals, in press), fisheries management (Mendoza, García & Baro, 2010; Leclere et al ., 2011), predicting water quality (Dzeroski & Grbovic, 1995), conducting ecological assessments (De’ath & Fabricius, 2000; Dakou et al ., 2007) and habitat suitability modelling (Džeroski, 2009). Still, according to a literature review, the use of decision trees in ecology is quite modest compared to other methods, particularly statistical approaches, and to other disciplines (Olden, Lawler & Poff, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%