2011
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2010.486416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using class-based feature selection for the classification of hyperspectral data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these studies fusion is performed on the classifiers' soft outputs (either probabilistic or fuzzy), through simple weighted averaging schemes [20,21,24], more complex fusion operators [22], or even by considering the stacked (soft) outputs of the multiple classifiers as a new feature space and subsequently training a new classifier on this new space [23]. Decision fusion has also been exploited for effectively tackling the very high dimensionality of hyperspectral data, by training multiple classifiers on different feature subsets derived from the source image and then combining their outputs [25][26][27][28][29]. The feature subsets are derived either through some appropriate feature extraction algorithm [25] or-more commonly-by applying some feature subgroups selection process [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these studies fusion is performed on the classifiers' soft outputs (either probabilistic or fuzzy), through simple weighted averaging schemes [20,21,24], more complex fusion operators [22], or even by considering the stacked (soft) outputs of the multiple classifiers as a new feature space and subsequently training a new classifier on this new space [23]. Decision fusion has also been exploited for effectively tackling the very high dimensionality of hyperspectral data, by training multiple classifiers on different feature subsets derived from the source image and then combining their outputs [25][26][27][28][29]. The feature subsets are derived either through some appropriate feature extraction algorithm [25] or-more commonly-by applying some feature subgroups selection process [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decision fusion has also been exploited for effectively tackling the very high dimensionality of hyperspectral data, by training multiple classifiers on different feature subsets derived from the source image and then combining their outputs [25][26][27][28][29]. The feature subsets are derived either through some appropriate feature extraction algorithm [25] or-more commonly-by applying some feature subgroups selection process [26][27][28][29]. Α more direct decision fusion approach combines the outputs of multiple different classifiers applied to a common data source [30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11]. Maghsoudi and others proposed a class-based schema for the band selection and classification of hyperspectral images [12].…”
Section: A Overseas Research Status Of Band Selection For Hyperspectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the further improvement in classification accuracy for subsequent classification will be hindered. Several studies have pointed out that the feature subset that can best describe the discriminants may vary for different pairs of classes [27][28][29]. Therefore, calculating for each pair, the class separability value might increase the scattering extent of selected features in the process of maximizing the averaged pairwise class separability value.…”
Section: Scatter-matrix-based Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%