Using Bluetooth proximity sensing to determine where office workers spend time at work

Abstract

BackgroundMost wearable devices that measure movement in workplaces cannot determine the context in which people spend time. This study examined the accuracy of Bluetooth sensing (10-second intervals) via the ActiGraph GT9X Link monitor to determine location in an office setting, using two simple, bespoke algorithms.MethodsFor one work day (mean±SD 6.2±1.1 hours), 30 office workers (30% men, aged 38±11 years) simultaneously wore chest-mounted cameras (video recording) and Bluetooth-enabled monitors (initialised as receivers) on the wrist and thigh. Additional monitors (initialised as beacons) were placed in the entry, kitchen, photocopy room, corridors, and the wearer’s office. Firstly, participant presence/absence at each location was predicted from the presence/absence of signals at that location (ignoring all other signals). Secondly, using the information gathered at multiple locations simultaneously, a simple heuristic model was used to predict at which location the participant was present. The Bluetooth-determined location for each algorithm was tested against the camera in terms of F-scores.ResultsWhen considering locations individually, the accuracy obtained was excellent in the office (F-score = 0.98 and 0.97 for thigh and wrist positions) but poor in other locations (F-score = 0.04 to 0.36), stemming primarily from a high false positive rate. The multi-location algorithm exhibited high accuracy for the office location (F-score = 0.97 for both wear positions). It also improved the F-scores obtained in the remaining locations, but not always to levels indicating good accuracy (e.g., F-score for photocopy room ≈0.1 in both wear positions).ConclusionsThe Bluetooth signalling function shows promise for determining where workers spend most of their time (i.e., their office). Placing beacons in multiple locations and using a rule-based decision model improved classification accuracy; however, for workplace locations visited infrequently or with considerable movement, accuracy was below desirable levels. Further development of algorithms is warranted.

Effects of Proximity between Companion Dogs and Their Caregivers on Heart Rate Variability Measures in Older Adults: A Pilot Study

“…For proximity tagging, the Link monitor set as "receiver" records the relative quality of the Bluetooth signal from the Link device set as "beacon." RSSI does not have an absolute value, and it does not correspond to a fixed spatial distance [21], although algorithms have be used to convert RSSI to distance within the first two meters [15]. In a validation study comparing location by wearable cameras and proximity tagging in office workers, the most accurate detection was when the participant was stationary [21].…”

“…RSSI does not have an absolute value, and it does not correspond to a fixed spatial distance [21], although algorithms have be used to convert RSSI to distance within the first two meters [15]. In a validation study comparing location by wearable cameras and proximity tagging in office workers, the most accurate detection was when the participant was stationary [21]. It is important to note that ActiGraph recently (April 1, 2020) posted on their website that proximity data can be compromised when a single device is set to both receive and beacon simultaneously [22].…”

Reshaping of the retail environment due to internet as a global competitor

“…Through Wi-Fi or Bluetooth signals, merchants can send content that is automatically displayed on consumer mobile devices. This leads to the selection of the addressed customers and thus to the targeting of a specific group of customers, who most likely buy directly from the given merchant [8,9,10,11]. According to a research study conducted by a team of marketing experts from Laval University, proximity marketing is a distribution channel for site-specific advertising.…”

Safe Beacon: A Bluetooth Based Solution to Monitor Egress of Dementia Sufferers within a Residential Setting

“…The listeners monitor the MAC address of Bluetooth LE beacons within their vicinity and relay the associated Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI) to a server backend. This RSSI can be used to roughly indicate distance from a listener [32]. However, detection is omnidirectional, as dictated by the common design goals of the antenna involved.…”

“…The higher the dBm value the closer the transmitting device is to a listener. The RSSI scale for Bluetooth devices is between 0 dBm and −127 dBm [32,36]. A RSSI of −126 dBm indicates that a beacon is at the limits of detection for a specific listener.…”