2005
DOI: 10.2514/1.12923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Autonomy Flight Software to Improve Science Return on Earth Observing One

Abstract: NASA's Earth Observing One Spacecraft (EO-1) has been adapted to host an advanced suite of onboard autonomy software designed to dramatically improve the quality and timeliness of science-data returned from remote-sensing missions. The Autonomous Sciencecraft Experiment (ASE) enables the spacecraft to autonomously detect and respond to dynamic scientifically interesting events observed from EO-1's low earth orbit. ASE includes software systems that perform science data analysis, mission planning, and runtime r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
102
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the spacecraft associated with the Earth Observing-1 (EO-1) mission already makes use of classification schemes to automatically analyze hyperspectral image data such that follow-up observations of interesting regions or events can be made (without any human interaction) [28,37]. As pointed out by Wagstaff and Bornstein [144,145], on board autonomy will be an important issue for future missions in general and in particular for those involving large one-way communication times like missions to Jupiter or Saturn.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the spacecraft associated with the Earth Observing-1 (EO-1) mission already makes use of classification schemes to automatically analyze hyperspectral image data such that follow-up observations of interesting regions or events can be made (without any human interaction) [28,37]. As pointed out by Wagstaff and Bornstein [144,145], on board autonomy will be an important issue for future missions in general and in particular for those involving large one-way communication times like missions to Jupiter or Saturn.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of search for MAPGEN does not allow it to search the infeasible space for plan solutions; that is, when a constraint violation arises, the planner backtracks. ASPEN admits search in the infeasible space (in fact, threats and constraint violations are rolled up into a single generic entity called a conflict) allowing for faster response to off-nominal execution (Chien et al 2000;Chien et al 2005). In fact, ASPEN has been demonstrated for in situ rover technology (Castano et al 2007;Estlin et al 1999;Gaines et al 2008) P. Maldague, A. Ko, D. Page, and T. Starbird (Maldague et al 1997) have developed a schedule generation framework (APGEN) that automatically generates and validates plans used for commanding spacecraft but does not perform general planning and scheduling.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent and comprehensive space-based application of goal-based operations is the ASE 1,2 . ASE is an autonomous software agent currently flying onboard the EO-1 spacecraft, which has demonstrated several integrated autonomy technologies that together enable science-directed autonomous operations.…”
Section: A Brief History Of Goal-based Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Autonomous Sciencecraft Experiment (ASE 1,2 ) on the Earth Observing 1 (EO-1) spacecraft is such an example. As a result of on-board image processing, ASE re-targets EO-1 on subsequent orbits based upon changes such as flooding, ice melt, and lava flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%