2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2006.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using an integrated approach to link biomarker responses and physiological stress to growth impairment of cadmium-exposed larval topsmelt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This contradicted previous hypotheses that predicted either lower metabolic rates (in response to energy shortage or the rampant hypoxia in sulfidic environments) or higher metabolic rate in sulfidic fish (in response to increased metabolic costs of sulfide detoxification; Riesch et al 2011b). It is important to note, however, that it remains unclear how routine metabolic rates measured in our experimental setup compare with routine metabolic rates in situ because all oxygen consumption measurements were conducted in the absence of H 2 S. In general, the presence of physiochemical stressors and toxicants can increase metabolic rates because coping strategies and detoxification pathways are energetically costly (Penttinen and Kukkonen 1998;Rose et al 2006;McKenzie et al 2007). In metazoans, H 2 S detoxification is primarily linked to the sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase pathway (Griesbeck et al 2000;Shahak and Hauska 2008), which oxidizes sulfide to less-toxic forms of sulfur while consuming energy (Ip et al 2004;Hildebrandt and Grieshaber 2008).…”
Section: Metabolic Rate Variation In Sulfidic Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This contradicted previous hypotheses that predicted either lower metabolic rates (in response to energy shortage or the rampant hypoxia in sulfidic environments) or higher metabolic rate in sulfidic fish (in response to increased metabolic costs of sulfide detoxification; Riesch et al 2011b). It is important to note, however, that it remains unclear how routine metabolic rates measured in our experimental setup compare with routine metabolic rates in situ because all oxygen consumption measurements were conducted in the absence of H 2 S. In general, the presence of physiochemical stressors and toxicants can increase metabolic rates because coping strategies and detoxification pathways are energetically costly (Penttinen and Kukkonen 1998;Rose et al 2006;McKenzie et al 2007). In metazoans, H 2 S detoxification is primarily linked to the sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase pathway (Griesbeck et al 2000;Shahak and Hauska 2008), which oxidizes sulfide to less-toxic forms of sulfur while consuming energy (Ip et al 2004;Hildebrandt and Grieshaber 2008).…”
Section: Metabolic Rate Variation In Sulfidic Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the evolution of increased metabolic rates in extreme environments is typically constrained by a reduced supply of resources required for metabolic expenditure (Waterman 1999(Waterman , 2001. While many studies have investigated immediate metabolic costs of exposure to physicochemical stressors and energy limitation (e.g., Haney and Nordlie 1997;Penttinen and Kukkonen 1998;Rose et al 2006;Wang et al 2006;McKenzie et al 2007;McCue 2010), it remains unclear how metabolic rates and metabolic rate plasticity evolve when populations adapt to diverse environmental stressors. Here, we explicitly tested for differences in body size and routine metabolic rate in the context of resource limitation in extremophile fish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomarkers or biological responses of organisms to toxicant exposure have been used for decades to indicate stress in aquatic organisms or the magnitude of environmental pollution [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Livers were surgically removed and processed immediately to measure apoptotic DNA fragmentation for genotoxicity through terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay and histopathological analysis through lipid accumulation and glycogen depletion. Detailed procedures of the TUNEL assay were published in Rose (2005) and Rose et al (2006). Briefly, liver samples were fixed in 10% methanol-free formalin for 48 h. The samples were dehydrated, imbedded in paraffin, and sectioned according to standard protocol at Central Histology Services (Sacramento, CA).…”
Section: Sublethal Responses In Fish Livermentioning
confidence: 99%