2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep33807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using an Artificial Neural Bypass to Restore Cortical Control of Rhythmic Movements in a Human with Quadriplegia

Abstract: Neuroprosthetic technology has been used to restore cortical control of discrete (non-rhythmic) hand movements in a paralyzed person. However, cortical control of rhythmic movements which originate in the brain but are coordinated by Central Pattern Generator (CPG) neural networks in the spinal cord has not been demonstrated previously. Here we show a demonstration of an artificial neural bypass technology that decodes cortical activity and emulates spinal cord CPG function allowing volitional rhythmic hand mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the participant was later able to think about static and dynamic/rhythmic movements, such as flexing and wiggling the finger or wrist, and switch between the two volitionally as shown in Fig. . These results exemplify what is possible with neural decoding and bioelectronic technology and are paving the way for applications in not only spinal cord injury, but potentially for stroke, traumatic brain injury, motor neuron disease and other areas in the future.…”
Section: Treating Paralysis With Technologymentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Furthermore, the participant was later able to think about static and dynamic/rhythmic movements, such as flexing and wiggling the finger or wrist, and switch between the two volitionally as shown in Fig. . These results exemplify what is possible with neural decoding and bioelectronic technology and are paving the way for applications in not only spinal cord injury, but potentially for stroke, traumatic brain injury, motor neuron disease and other areas in the future.…”
Section: Treating Paralysis With Technologymentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This was a Phase I trial of a MEA-BCI interfaced with the Neurolife a transcutaneous, forearm FES. Like similar intracortical BCI studies, [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]35,36 this report was limited to 1 participant, the first to use the system, due to the invasive nature of the investigational brain implant and time required for training and assessment. Technical BCI-FES features 13,37 (fig 1), the Utah Array b MEA implantation procedures, and machine learning algorithms used to generate decoders were described previously.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals with tetraplegia prioritize recovery of upper limb strength and dexterity to facilitate their independence. [1][2][3][4][5] Voluntary control of hand grasp has been restored to paralyzed limbs using noninvasive [6][7][8][9][10][11] and cortical microelectrode array (MEA)based [12][13][14][15][16] brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) that translate brain activity to hand movements evoked through implanted [10][11][12] or transcutaneous [6][7][8][9][13][14][15][16] functional electrical stimulation (FES). [6][7][8][9]12,13 However, clinically significant gains on tests of upper limb function have not been demonstrated using BCI-FES.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These circuits are called central pattern generators (CPGs), which produce motor patterns for rhythmic movement (Marder and Bucher 2001). Recently, artificial CPGs have been created in software and linked to decoded brain activity sensed in primary motor cortex of a paralyzed human (Sharma et al 2016). In this work, CPG behavior was emulated by using a numerical model of an oscillatory neural circuit.…”
Section: Decoding Rhythmic Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%