Using an analytic hierarchy process approach to prioritize public policies addressing family farming in Brazil

Abstract

In Brazil, some see intensive, large-scale production of sugarcane-based ethanol, based on a model of capital and land concentration, as a threat to the survival of family farming. Family farmers are increasingly under pressure to sell or rent land to mills where sugarcane monoculture is expanding. In this context, the government is working to formulate or change public policies in order to support farmer livelihoods in sugarcane growing regions. The present study is based on research conducted in the municipality of Ipiranga de Goiás, Goiás State, Brazil. It employs the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, with participation of stakeholders at federal, state and municipal levels, to support public policy decision-making addressing family farming. The stakeholders prioritize environmental and economic benefits as the most important criteria requiring the attention of policy makers. Also, stakeholders agree that diversification of production is the most appropriate alternative for strengthening family farming. The AHP approach can be the starting point in the formulation of public policies. The approach helps ensure transparency, and it purposefully includes family farmer points of view. Policies derived from this process, therefore, may have a higher likelihood of being supported and accepted by farmers.Keywords: Analytic hierarchy process, Decision-making, Multiple stakeholders, Family farming, Sugarcane. Highlights-We assess policy priorities of family farmers in an area of sugarcane expansion.-We use the analytic hierarchy process with participation of multiple stakeholders.-A case study presents a practical application of the method.-Public policies addressing family farming should focus on diversification of production.-Sensitivity analysis demonstrates robustness of results.

Understanding the Implications of Alternative Bioenergy Crops to Support Smallholder Farmers in Brazil

“…As the above discussion illustrates, smallholder farming in Brazil has historically taken a secondary and subordinate role to large-scale sugarcane agribusiness. The latter has garnered the bulk of policy attention from Brazilian policymakers, eager to ensure its modernisation and reproduction [55]. Focus on cash crop production over food crops further alienated smallholder farmers.…”

Multivariate Analysis in Formulation of the Benefit-Cost Index Related to the Sugarcane Production System in the Quirinopolis Municipality Productive Center, Goias, Brazil

“…The sugarcane crop emerges in this scenario of strength of the agricultural business sector with very intense growth in recent years due to the need for renewable fuels driving the economy. The impacts of the expansion of sugarcane plantation for biofuels agribusiness, as well as economic benefits bring growing perception of social, environmental and land use problems to the regional community (Petrini et al, 2016).…”

A Visual Analytics Framework Case Study: Understanding Colombia’s National Administrative Department of Statistics Datasets

“…First, about public policy and data-driven policy making, Brazil had useful data about some activities in their cities, but the authorities were not using them for prioritizing the different public policies. Thus, Petrini et al [8] applied an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) on their data and then they build some visualizations that show them adequately. As the policymakers were evaluating various priorities at the same time (environmental, economic, social), the stack bar chart was the good idiom ( Fig.…”