1995
DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(93)e0240-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using AHP for resource allocation problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
46
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier attempts of theoretical AHP development can be found in Belton and Gear [4]; Dyer [15]; Satty [67][68][69]; and Basak and Satty [2]. The wide spectrum of AHP applications can be seen in the literature too [57,62,77]. Hence, AHP may help determine the priorities of alternatives independently for every criterion at each level in our study.…”
Section: Determination Of the Weighting Factorsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Earlier attempts of theoretical AHP development can be found in Belton and Gear [4]; Dyer [15]; Satty [67][68][69]; and Basak and Satty [2]. The wide spectrum of AHP applications can be seen in the literature too [57,62,77]. Hence, AHP may help determine the priorities of alternatives independently for every criterion at each level in our study.…”
Section: Determination Of the Weighting Factorsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Fuzzy MCDM has also been applied to transportation development, such as the ranking of road investments by Pearman et al (1989), the assessment of the influence of highway constructions with AHP by Azis (1990), and the selection of constructors or procurement methods (Fong and Choi 2000;Al-Subhi Al-Harbi 2001;Mahdi et al 2002). Its applications to budget allocation include a mixed integer knapsack model for allocating funds to highway safety improvements by Emanuel and Kozanidis (2002), budget allocations with the Target Planning Model for academic organizations by Kwak and Diminnie (1987), resource allocation with the AHP by Ramanathan and Ganesh (1995), the use of a genetic algorithm to resolve budget allocation issues for historical site renovations by Perng et al (2007), the use of a non-linear planning model to process the optimal financial budgets of software development projects by Han et al (2005), and the use of multi-attribute utility theory to allocate budgets for infrastructure renewal projects in universities by Karydas and Gifun (2006). These research studies have produced good results in the selection or ranking of projects with fuzzy MCDM to tackle unquantifiable or qualitative issues, apart from budget allocations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the AHP is often used to address various kinds of situation problems, such as weight determination, alternative assessment, quality management, resource allocation, and strategic planning (Liberatore, 1987;Cheng and Mon, 1994;Kwong and Bai, 2002;Ahsan and Bartema, 2004;MelĆ³n et al, 2008;Hermans and Thissen, 2009;Luca, 2014). Arbel and Orgler (1990) introduced and described the AHP method to evaluate a strategy for bank mergers and acquisitions, while Ramanathan and Ganesh (1995) applied the AHP to solve the multi-criteria problem of resource allocation, by transforming the multi-criteria problem to a single-objective linear programming problem. In addition, based on the AHP, Tam and Tummala (2001) developed a model to evaluate a vendor of telecommunications system, while Zeki (2005) developed a fuzzy method to evaluate a concept involving new product development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%