2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10666-009-9213-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Site Selection of Watershed Hydrological Monitoring Stations Using Remote Sensing and Grey Integer Programming

Abstract: Precipitation, infiltration and percolation, stream flow, plant transpiration, soil moisture changes, and groundwater recharge are all intimately related with each other to form water balance dynamics on the surface of the Earth. To monitor change in hydrological systems with minimum effort, however, hydrological monitoring networks at the watershed scale should be deployed at critical locations to advance the monitoring and sensing capability. One of the science questions is how to develop an optimum arrangem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of existing AWSs in Turkey was considered insufficient for the prediction of natural disasters; thus, the aim was to establish new AWSs with the TEFER project. Based on published site selection criteria researched in the literature (WMO, ; ; EPA, ; Shepherd, ; Yalcın, ; Baltas and Mimikou, ; Chang and Makkasorn, ; Kidd and Chapman, ) and on the distances from suitable or non‐suitable areas (EPA, ; Oke, ; NWCG, ; Overton, ), six primary criteria were determined, as listed below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of existing AWSs in Turkey was considered insufficient for the prediction of natural disasters; thus, the aim was to establish new AWSs with the TEFER project. Based on published site selection criteria researched in the literature (WMO, ; ; EPA, ; Shepherd, ; Yalcın, ; Baltas and Mimikou, ; Chang and Makkasorn, ; Kidd and Chapman, ) and on the distances from suitable or non‐suitable areas (EPA, ; Oke, ; NWCG, ; Overton, ), six primary criteria were determined, as listed below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since not all violations have the same severity, a weighting factor has been used to characterize the violations to each range for the pollutants CO, SO 2 , and NO x . The segmented non‐linear weighting function has been chosen in this research: normalNnormalvnormali= normali=1Ttruek=1normalNnormalttrue(normalwk+1 wnormalktrue)true(normalxnormali xnormalktrue)Xtrue(normalxk+1 xnormalktrue) where normalNnormalvnormali is the violation score for the i th candidate location, w k is the weighing factor corresponding to threshold x k , x k is the k th threshold ( X = 0, if ( x i – x k ) ≤ 0 and X = 1, otherwise), N t is the total number of thresholds, and T is the total number of simulated observations.…”
Section: Air Quality Monitoring Network Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since not all violations have the same severity, a weighting factor has been used to characterize the violations to each range for the pollutants CO, SO 2 , and NO x . The segmented non-linear weighting function has been chosen in this research: [30][31][32][33][34]…”
Section: Air Quality Monitoring Siting Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distributed monitoring systems are predicated on the development of new sensors capable of monitoring the contaminants of interest. A critical component of implementing such a network is the identification of the optimal locations to deploy environmental sensors or establish sampling sites [4,6,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%