Using Academic Courses to Generate Data for Use in Evidence Based Library Planning

Brown-Sica, Margaret

doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2013.01.001

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, with such a broad and abstract definition, implementation is difficult. For example, when Brown-Sica and Beall (2008), based on Nockleby's definition, suggest automated moderation and filtering as a means of dealing with hate speech in an online context, the definition raises the question: what exactly should be moderated or filtered? What exactly is meant by “communications of animosity or disparagement”?…”

Section: Difficulties Of Definition and Delimitationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a Definition of Hate Speech—With a Focus on Online Contexts

Hietanen

Eddebo

2022

Journal of Communication Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As legislators and platforms tackle the challenge of suppressing hate speech online, questions about its definition remain unresolved. In this review we discuss three issues: What are the main challenges encountered when defining hate speech? What alternatives are there for the definition of hate speech? What is the relationship between the nature and scope of the definition and its operationability? By tracing both efforts to regulate and to define hate speech in legal, paralegal, and tech platform contexts, we arrive at four possible modes of definition: teleological, pure consequentialist, formal, and consensus or relativist definitions. We suggest the need for a definition where hate speech encompasses those speech acts that tend towards certain ethically proscribed ends, which are destructive in terms of their consequences, and express certain ideas that are transgressions of specific ethical norms.

show abstract

Section: Difficulties Of Definition and Delimitationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a Definition of Hate Speech—With a Focus on Online Contexts

Hietanen

Eddebo

2022

Journal of Communication Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In contemporary practice within the digital environment, coherent and generally accepted definitions of hate speech for moderation and suppression, are generally lacking. Moreover, the definitions and templates in use are vague and to some extent arbitrary -something which invites a whole host of problems, especially when it comes to automatic moderation and censorship (Brown & Beall, 2008).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Asian Conference on Ethics, Religion & Philosophy 2023 Official Conference Proceedings

2023

ACERP Official Conference Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although it is common to assume that monotheism grows naturally from polytheism, each of these religious systems presents, in fact, a distinct and sustainable product of spiritual evolution. The main question that arises in this respect is whether such distinctness and sustainability should result in mutual incompatibility and lack of common grounds or whether the two systems could remain dependent on each other both in substance and in form. In terms of substance, it may be more rewarding to approach the evolution of religion not as a headway progress from inferior to superior but as an evolving response to changes of the scope within which the numinous is perceived by human beings. The author believes that this scope is mostly determined by the predominant social unit within which a given religion is professed and practiced. Thus, animism operates chiefly within the context of extended family; mature polytheism corresponds to the level of clan/tribe, while monotheism proper belongs to the scale of nation/empire. As regards the corresponding evolution of the form, one can say that the above succession/expansion of scope results in a situation where newer religions tend to borrow and assimilate their signs and symbols from their predecessors. This creates a relationship of semiotic interdependence between different systems, which is, however, never perfectly symmetrical due to monotheism's more stronger propensity towards 'religiophagia'. Yet the latter's current tendency towards greater reflection and selfexamination inspires cautious optimism with respect to an improved probability of eventual interreligious harmony.

show abstract

“…Finnish Land Use and Building Act 132/1999 [3]. Recently the focus of participatory design research has been on architecture in designing library spaces [4] or school environment [5] and on urban planning in structural development in different types of districts [6], [7].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Motivations, Results and the Role of Technology in Participatory Design Research during 2000’s – a Review in the Field of Architecture and Urban Planning

Vainio

2016

Architecture and Urban Planning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

-This study analyses motivations, results and technology of the participatory design approach. It is a review based on 32 papers, presenting recent studies on participatory design in architecture and urban planning during the time period from 2000 to 2014. As a result, the main motivations, outcomes and the role of technology are emphasised and discussed. Furthermore, recommendations for future research directions for participatory design research in the field of urban planning are also provided.

show abstract

Using Academic Courses to Generate Data for Use in Evidence Based Library Planning

Cited by 8 publications

References 11 publications

Towards a Definition of Hate Speech—With a Focus on Online Contexts

Towards a Definition of Hate Speech—With a Focus on Online Contexts

The Asian Conference on Ethics, Religion & Philosophy 2023 Official Conference Proceedings

Motivations, Results and the Role of Technology in Participatory Design Research during 2000’s – a Review in the Field of Architecture and Urban Planning

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About