2018
DOI: 10.1002/sys.21447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a systems engineering framework for additive manufacturing

Abstract: System engineering life cycles can be used by enterprises to make assessments that facilitate the effective insertion of technology into existing practices. The updated systems life cycle processes standard, ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288:2015, is examined to assess additive manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D printing. AM's digital nature emerges as a major theme. AM's introduction into the aviation spare part supply chain is also explored using a project crashing illustration. The illustration showed that AM could be l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nineteen publications addressed the effect of complexity reduction. This means that in single products the amount of parts is reduced (Attaran 2017 ; Togwe et al 2018 ; Tuck et al 2007 ) Parts consisting of multiple functionalities can get consolidated into a single part, without the need for further assembly (Barz et al 2016 ; Cohen 2014 ). Complexity reduction also means that certain steps within the supply chain become redundant or they are simplified (Attaran 2017 ; Ivanov et al 2019 ; Khajavi et al 2018b ; Sasson and Johnson 2016 ), for example the production of tooling (Cohen 2014 ; Romero-Torres and Vieira 2016 ).…”
Section: Results Of the Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nineteen publications addressed the effect of complexity reduction. This means that in single products the amount of parts is reduced (Attaran 2017 ; Togwe et al 2018 ; Tuck et al 2007 ) Parts consisting of multiple functionalities can get consolidated into a single part, without the need for further assembly (Barz et al 2016 ; Cohen 2014 ). Complexity reduction also means that certain steps within the supply chain become redundant or they are simplified (Attaran 2017 ; Ivanov et al 2019 ; Khajavi et al 2018b ; Sasson and Johnson 2016 ), for example the production of tooling (Cohen 2014 ; Romero-Torres and Vieira 2016 ).…”
Section: Results Of the Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of AM on legal and safety aspects in the supply chain is addressed by 11.9% of the publications, making it the area least discussed. Topics raised are intellectual property issues (Dwivedi et al 2017 ; Kietzmann et al 2015 ; Shukla et al 2018 ), the need for AM quality control due to sample size one (Kietzmann et al 2015 ; Togwe et al 2018 ) and the threat of open-source designs, for example the possibility of manufacturing weapons (Attaran 2017 ).…”
Section: Results Of the Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few studies address framework for AM technology/implementation in areas such as: mass customization, supply chain management, process monitoring, conceptual design, quality management, medical devices, etc. as identified in these articles (Mellor, 2014; Handal, 2017; Deradjat and Minshall, 2015; Pradel et al, 2018; Panesar et al , 2015; Cummings et al, 2017; Togwe et al , 2018; and Williams et al , 2011) and further elaborated in the next few paragraphs of this section.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This concept, fundamental to SE, can be applied to different types of systems to improve their design or uncover hidden aspects of the system life cycle. For example, it has been applied by following the standard ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 to assess the impact and potential of additive manufacturing [56]. Life Cycle Processes contribute directly to the creation of products, systems, or services, reflecting the lean view of an overall lifecycle within which functions serve, as opposed to the more traditional paradigms that allow each function to suboptimise around its own operations [57].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%