2004
DOI: 10.1080/0950069032000070252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a Science Writing Heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh‐grade science: quantitative and qualitative aspects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
132
0
13

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
7
132
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Germane to this focus on disciplinary texts, many scholars define proficient adolescent literacy skills more specifically as the ability to read, interpret, critique, and produce the discourse of a disciplinary area (Bain, 2006;Hand, Wallace, & Yang, 2004;Lee, 2005;Wineburg, 2001;Wineburg & Martin, 2004). These scholars argue that to learn in a content area, young people need access to the conventions of disciplinary knowledge production and communication.…”
Section: What Is Adolescent Literacy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Germane to this focus on disciplinary texts, many scholars define proficient adolescent literacy skills more specifically as the ability to read, interpret, critique, and produce the discourse of a disciplinary area (Bain, 2006;Hand, Wallace, & Yang, 2004;Lee, 2005;Wineburg, 2001;Wineburg & Martin, 2004). These scholars argue that to learn in a content area, young people need access to the conventions of disciplinary knowledge production and communication.…”
Section: What Is Adolescent Literacy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies (Atila, Günel, & Büyükkkasap, 2010;Gunel, Hand, & Gunduz, 2006;Hand, Gunel, & Ulu, 2009) used multimodal representations embedded within writing-to-learn activities in order to benefit more from writing. There were also some studies integrating writing-to-learn activities within argument-based inquiry classrooms using approaches such as the science writing heuristic (SWH; Hand & Choi, 2010;Hand, Wallace, & Yang, 2004;Hohenshell & Hand, 2006) and argument-driven inquiry (Sampson & Walker, 2012). For example, Hand, Wallace et al (2004) investigated the contribution of using a second task of writing a textbook explanation in SWH classes to students' conceptual understanding.…”
Section: Contribution Of This Paper To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were also some studies integrating writing-to-learn activities within argument-based inquiry classrooms using approaches such as the science writing heuristic (SWH; Hand & Choi, 2010;Hand, Wallace, & Yang, 2004;Hohenshell & Hand, 2006) and argument-driven inquiry (Sampson & Walker, 2012). For example, Hand, Wallace et al (2004) investigated the contribution of using a second task of writing a textbook explanation in SWH classes to students' conceptual understanding. There were three groups: a control group, a treatment group exposed to the SWH approach, and a treatment group exposed to the SWH approach and writing a textbook explanation for their peers (SWH + textbook).…”
Section: Contribution Of This Paper To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…학생들은 논의과정에서 자신들의 주장과 논리적인 연결을 가진 증거를 제시할 때 다중표상을 가장 활발하게 사용한다 Kelly & Takao, 2001). 또한 글쓰기에서 다중표상은 과학적 소 양을 발달시키는데 중요한 요인이 되며 (Lemke, 1998), 다중표상을 사 용한 쓰기를 통해 학생들은 시각적 정보를 구체화하게 되고, 그 의미를 명확하게 파악하게 된다 (Hand et al, 2004). 이러한 다중표상의 사용 에서 단순히 여러 가지 표상을 사용하는 것이 중요한 것이 아니라, 과학적 설명에서 표상 간의 전환을 통해 학습과 다중표상 사이를 직접 적으로 연결하는 것이 중요하다 (Pineda & Garza, 2000).…”
unclassified