Abstract:This article discusses how qualitative vignettes were combined with interviews to explore a complex public health issue; that is, promoting unhealthy foods and beverages to children and adolescents. It outlines how the technique was applied in practice and the combination of vignette-based interviews with a broader approach involving Gadamerian hermeneutics. Twenty-one participants from the public health community and the marketing and food and beverage industries took part in vignette-based interviews between… Show more
“…The use of the vignettes gave the ability to discuss sensitive topics in a structured and non-threatening manner, compared to discussing personal experiences of the participants. However, the use of vignettes may have elicited different views than real-life situations would have [27]. Another strength of the study was the use of gender-neutral names in the vignettes, thus that gender bias could be prevented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2nd vignette depicted an adolescent who had many issues, at home and in school, with high levels of school absenteeism. After one vignette was read, a discussion was started using pre-defined questions on the help-seeking behavior of the participants if they were to be in a similar situation, such as facilitating factors or barriers to seek help and the chosen help source (see Appendices A and B) [27,28]. Vignettes provided practical scenarios in an accessible form to the research population [27].…”
Section: Topic Guidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After one vignette was read, a discussion was started using pre-defined questions on the help-seeking behavior of the participants if they were to be in a similar situation, such as facilitating factors or barriers to seek help and the chosen help source (see Appendices A and B) [27,28]. Vignettes provided practical scenarios in an accessible form to the research population [27]. The method of using vignettes enabled the exploration of participants' subjective belief systems: "Participants are typically asked to respond to these stories with what they would do in a particular situation or how they think a third person would respond" [28].…”
This study aimed to get insight into adolescents’ views on help-seeking for emotional and behavioral problems. Fourteen focus groups were conducted. Two vignettes, depicting one healthy adolescent with few issues and one adolescent with severe psychosocial problems, were used to structure the focus groups. The focus groups were framed within a youth help-seeking model. Adolescents (mean age of 15.0 years) generally reported seeking help from friends or the internet for mild issues and from a person they trust like a parent or school mentor, for more severe problems. Adolescents correctly recognized the issues in vignette one as surmountable and the problems in vignette two as severe. A bond of trust with a help source was regarded as the main facilitator for the decision to seek help. Adolescents reported a preference for help sources who clearly displayed their expertise for the issue at hand and for informal help-sources, particularly friends.
“…The use of the vignettes gave the ability to discuss sensitive topics in a structured and non-threatening manner, compared to discussing personal experiences of the participants. However, the use of vignettes may have elicited different views than real-life situations would have [27]. Another strength of the study was the use of gender-neutral names in the vignettes, thus that gender bias could be prevented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2nd vignette depicted an adolescent who had many issues, at home and in school, with high levels of school absenteeism. After one vignette was read, a discussion was started using pre-defined questions on the help-seeking behavior of the participants if they were to be in a similar situation, such as facilitating factors or barriers to seek help and the chosen help source (see Appendices A and B) [27,28]. Vignettes provided practical scenarios in an accessible form to the research population [27].…”
Section: Topic Guidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After one vignette was read, a discussion was started using pre-defined questions on the help-seeking behavior of the participants if they were to be in a similar situation, such as facilitating factors or barriers to seek help and the chosen help source (see Appendices A and B) [27,28]. Vignettes provided practical scenarios in an accessible form to the research population [27]. The method of using vignettes enabled the exploration of participants' subjective belief systems: "Participants are typically asked to respond to these stories with what they would do in a particular situation or how they think a third person would respond" [28].…”
This study aimed to get insight into adolescents’ views on help-seeking for emotional and behavioral problems. Fourteen focus groups were conducted. Two vignettes, depicting one healthy adolescent with few issues and one adolescent with severe psychosocial problems, were used to structure the focus groups. The focus groups were framed within a youth help-seeking model. Adolescents (mean age of 15.0 years) generally reported seeking help from friends or the internet for mild issues and from a person they trust like a parent or school mentor, for more severe problems. Adolescents correctly recognized the issues in vignette one as surmountable and the problems in vignette two as severe. A bond of trust with a help source was regarded as the main facilitator for the decision to seek help. Adolescents reported a preference for help sources who clearly displayed their expertise for the issue at hand and for informal help-sources, particularly friends.
“…Ydermere argumenterer Jackson et al (8), at respondenterne relaterer sig til vignetten på en anden måde, end til de eksempler intervieweren mundtligt udtrykker i løbet af samtalen. Sådanne eksempler vil af respondenten oftest blive opfattet som noget, intervieweren inddrager spontant og dermed kun aktuelt for det pågaeldende interview med dets specifikke respondenter -uanset at det sagtens kunne vaere et eksempel, der er en fast del af interviewguiden.…”
Using a research project on the understanding of family centered care among health care professionals, this article presents how vignettes and displays can be used as tools in qualitative research. Vignettes are hypothetical but potentially real simulations of specific scenarios used in the production of data, and displays are condensed visual and selfexplanatory presentations of data used in the final reporting. It is common knowledge that vignettes and displays can be important tools in themselves. We argue that incorporating both already in the design phase will strengthen the cogency of a project, as it forces researchers to pay attention to the relationship between data input and analytical output from the beginning and throughout the research process. We conclude that vignettes and displays are important research and project management tools facilitating more cogent and resource efficient projects, but we also conclude that they are not relevant to all qualitative projects.
“…The vignette usually provides sufficient context and information for participants to have an understanding of the scenario being depicted, but needs to be vague in ways that encourage participants to fill in the detail (Braun andClarke 2013, Sparkes andSmith 2014). Vignettes have been used in a range of health research, including the investigation of attitudes toward complex public health issues (Jackson et al 2015), as well as understandings of illness symptoms (Oberoi et al 2015), and the impact of sociological variables such as age and ethnicity upon lived experiences of illness (Higginbottom 2006). They have also been found to assist health professionals in identifying and understanding how people's asthma narratives may be helping or hindering positive healthcare behaviours and self-management (Owton et al 2015).…”
Section: Narrative and Vignette Approaches In Healthcarementioning
2 | P a g e 3 | P a g e
Opening up dialogues and airways: using vignettes to enrich asthma understandings in exercise participantsThis article explores the lived experience of asthma in a specific population of sport and exercise participants, drawing on an approach currently under-utilised in studies of asthma: vignettes. These were used as an elicitation technique in research with19 frequent exercisers and sports participants with asthma, eight of whom responded to vignettes. We describe and evaluate this approach as deployed in relation to a phenomenological study of the lived experience of asthma, and consider how employing vignette-based research can encourage people with asthma to reflect critically on their experiences and ways of being-inthe-world. This was found to be a powerful way of challenging taken-for-granted assumptions, and stimulating consideration of behaviour change. The findings we report here cohere around two principal themes that emerged as salient: 1) somatic empathy; and 2) the power of sharing stories and opening up dialogues.Understanding the complexity of asthma experiences can, we argue, be of great practical value both to those with asthma and also to healthcare and exercise professionals in tailoring more effective treatments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.