Using a Non-Judgmental Stance to Promote Trustworthiness in Action Research

Gabarre, Serge; Gabarre, Cécile; Din, Rosseni

doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2387

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For these reasons, the authors opted for a critical review over a meta-analysis. Following the approach advocated by Gabarre et al (2021), the authors organised the literature review by conducting a critical review of studies on the implementation of ICT to enhance ELT". Guzzo et al (1987) suggested approaching the task of conducting a critical review in the same fashion as a quantitative study.…”

Section: Critical Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Critical Review of Enhancing English Language Teaching Using ICT Implementation

Adzhari,

Din,

Othman

et al. 2023

IJARBSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A critical review of the literature was conducted to analyse the current body of knowledge on using an Information and Communication Technology implementation to enhance English Language Teaching. The topical and critical review approaches are the two main approaches in conducting a literature review. The authors of this article discuss the critical review that was conducted using a five-step method. First, defining a research objective and a research question. Second, identifying a significant sample of sources in the literature. Third, collecting data after applying excluding filters from these sources. Fourth, reporting the results from critical analysis and findings using descriptive statistics. Finally, discussing the implications from the results that were identified. The authors were able to identify four themes based on the critical review's findings which were then expressed in a conceptual framework. In addition, the review of the literature revealed a knowledge gap. Additional research on

show abstract

Section: Critical Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Critical Review of Enhancing English Language Teaching Using ICT Implementation

Adzhari,

Din,

Othman

et al. 2023

IJARBSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Another important aspect of understanding positionality in research is being non-judgmental. This approach helps researchers to build truthworthiness which adds reliability to the research [15]. As the researcher was not part of their caste, it was perceived by participants that the researcher may not be able to understand and/or be judgmental when talking discrimination, they face from higher caste groups.…”

Section: Researchermentioning

confidence: 99%

Researching Dalits and health care: Considering positionality

Thapa,

Regmi,

Van Teijlingen

et al. 2023

Health Prospect

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This methods paper explores the issue of the researcher’s positionality and its potential impact on the overall qualitative research process. After defining positionality this paper outlines its potential influences on the research process and findings. In order to illustrate the concept of positionality in a real-world example a case study approach is used based on the first author’s PhD research among Dalits in Nepal. The paper finishes by outlining some of the ways of addressing the issues arising from positionality of the researcher.

show abstract

“…At [22] enabled the equitable participation of all participants in the round table discussions. Table facilitators recorded the main points of argumentation articulated in each round of discussion and shared the outcomes of prior rounds for further discussion with each new group as participants moved between tables and topics for further discussion and clarification.…”

Section: Part 2: World Café Style Consensus Workhopmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Consensus workshop data collection ceased upon workshop completion. A non-judgmental stance [22] towards all perspectives was taken throughout the study. Modified Delphi questionnaire themes and statements emerged iteratively from the physician interviews, unpublished systematic literature review, and previously published work on nurses, residents and family perspectives on how to improve a supportive approach to end-of-life care in LTC Equitable facilitation techniques were deployed in the workshop discussions.…”

Section: Part 2: World Café Style Consensus Workhopmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-disciplinary supportive end of life care in long-term care: an integrative approach to improving end of life

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Optimal supportive end of life care for frail, older adults in long term care (LTC) homes involves symptom management, family participation, advance care plans, and organizational support. This 2-phase study aimed to combine multi-disciplinary opinions, build group consensus, and identify the top interventions needed to develop a supportive end of life care strategy for LTC. Methods A consensus-building approach was undertaken in 2 Phases. The first phase deployed modified Delphi questionnaires to address and transform diverse opinions into group consensus. The second phase explored and prioritized the interventions needed to develop a supportive end of life care strategy for LTC. Development of the Delphi questionnaire was based on findings from published results of physician perspectives of barriers and facilitators to optimal supportive end of life care in LTC, a literature search of palliative care models in LTC, and published results of patient, family and nursing perspectives of supportive end of life care in long term care. The second phase involved World Café Style workshop discussions. A multi-disciplinary purposive sample of individuals inclusive of physicians; staff, administrators, residents, family members, and content experts in palliative care, and researchers in geriatrics and gerontology participated in round one of the modified Delphi questionnaire. A second purposive sample derived from round one participants completed the second round of the modified Delphi questionnaire. A third purposive sample (including participants from the Delphi panel) then convened to identify the top priorities needed to develop a supportive end-of-life care strategy for LTC. Results 19 participants rated 75 statements on a 9-point Likert scale during the first round of the modified Delphi questionnaire. 11 participants (participation rate 58 %) completed the second round of the modified Delphi questionnaire and reached consensus on the inclusion of 71candidate statements. 35 multidisciplinary participants discussed the 71 statements remaining and prioritized the top clinical practice, communication, and policy interventions needed to develop a supportive end of life strategy for LTC. Conclusions Multi-disciplinary stakeholders identified and prioritized the top interventions needed to develop a 5-point supportive end of life care strategy for LTC.

show abstract

Using a Non-Judgmental Stance to Promote Trustworthiness in Action Research

Cited by 5 publications

References 22 publications

A Critical Review of Enhancing English Language Teaching Using ICT Implementation

A Critical Review of Enhancing English Language Teaching Using ICT Implementation

Researching Dalits and health care: Considering positionality

Multi-disciplinary supportive end of life care in long-term care: an integrative approach to improving end of life

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About