2015
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.02.140209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a Lay Cancer Screening Navigator to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates

Abstract: Introduction: Preventive care is often not performed during the ambulatory office visit due to the acute nature of the visit. One possible strategy is the use of a lay cancer screening navigator using the lay health worker model.Methods: A training program for the lay cancer screening navigator and a patient registry for colorectal cancer screening was developed. The RE-AIM framework was used to evaluate the intervention. Descriptive statistics were generated for patient demographics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Study characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Six of the 29 studies had strong methodological quality, [38][39][40][41][42][43][44] 12 moderate, and 11 weak [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] (Annex 2). When assessed according to the TIDieR checklist, 24 studies reported procedures, who provided, how, where, and when.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Study characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Six of the 29 studies had strong methodological quality, [38][39][40][41][42][43][44] 12 moderate, and 11 weak [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] (Annex 2). When assessed according to the TIDieR checklist, 24 studies reported procedures, who provided, how, where, and when.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 13 studies that focused on colorectal cancer, 12 studies noted significant increase in adherence to colorectal cancer screening. 38,39,41,47,48,51,53,59,61,63,64,66 Positive outcomes in screening for multiple cancers such as breast, colorectal, cervical, and prostate were also noted in all the three studies 38,45,66 (with varied mythological qualities) that focused on multiple cancers. Two interventions, one with strong methodological quality 43 and other weak, 49 focused on the time for cancer diagnostic resolution following an abnormal screening result and both reported a significantly shorter time among the navigated participants compared to those without navigation.…”
Section: Effects Of Chw Navigation Intervention (Table 2)mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although this was a feasible strategy for older patients aged 50 to 74 years [71] , it has yet to be determined how effective this strategy would be in younger individuals.…”
Section: Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%