The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1080/02705060.2014.976666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a laser particle analyzer to demonstrate relationships between wind strength andMicrocystiscolony size distribution in Lake Taihu, China

Abstract: Cell density and colony size distribution of Microcystis spp. at 14 sites in Meiliang Bay and Gonghu Bay of Lake Taihu, China, were determined using a laser particle analyzer. Cell density increased from 1 July to 18 August 2010 and exceeded 20 £ 10 7 cells L ¡1 on 15 July and 18 August. The maximum D 50 (the particle size value when the percentage volumes are 50%) of Microcystis colonies (524 mm) occurred on 1 September. The differences in D 50 values in different areas were not significant most of the time. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size frequency distribution measured by microscopy on samples collected at stations WE 2, 4, 6, and 8 in July to October 2013 and June to July 2014 gave a similar size distribution to that of the 4 August 2014 sample (Figure a). It is likely that the colony size distribution varies to some extent spatially and temporally [e.g., Lin et al ., ], and our estimate could be refined through additional measurements. Even so, the consistency between our two estimated size distributions gives some indication of representativeness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size frequency distribution measured by microscopy on samples collected at stations WE 2, 4, 6, and 8 in July to October 2013 and June to July 2014 gave a similar size distribution to that of the 4 August 2014 sample (Figure a). It is likely that the colony size distribution varies to some extent spatially and temporally [e.g., Lin et al ., ], and our estimate could be refined through additional measurements. Even so, the consistency between our two estimated size distributions gives some indication of representativeness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%