2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14064-8_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a Fingertip Tactile Device to Substitute Kinesthetic Feedback in Haptic Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When motors span in opposite directions the belt applied a perpendicular force to the user's fingertip while, if motors span in the same direction, the belt applied a tangential force on the skin. That device was used in [10] to provide cutaneous feedback in an industrial application involving heavy duty machines, and in [11] for experiences of remote cutaneous interaction. A similar device has been also used in [12], where the authors presented a new approach to sensory substitution in haptics called sensory subtraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When motors span in opposite directions the belt applied a perpendicular force to the user's fingertip while, if motors span in the same direction, the belt applied a tangential force on the skin. That device was used in [10] to provide cutaneous feedback in an industrial application involving heavy duty machines, and in [11] for experiences of remote cutaneous interaction. A similar device has been also used in [12], where the authors presented a new approach to sensory substitution in haptics called sensory subtraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• both kinesthetic and cutaneous feedback (i.e., the approach proposed here, task KC), • cutaneous feedback only (i.e., the approach employed in [12], [19], [15], task C), • kinesthetic feedback only, computed according to the unmodified algorithm presented in [7] (task K). Since the goal of the task is to avoid overrunning the stiff constraint, it is natural to consider, as a measure of transparency (i.e., of correct perception of the remote environment), the penetrationp inside the stiff constraint itself, averaged over the six repetitions of each experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). This is why cutaneous feedback has been efficiently employed in different teleoperation scenarios [12], [19], [15] and will be employed here to enhance the transparency of common teleoperation systems without affecting their stability.…”
Section: Cutaneous Force Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When one single motor is used as proposed by Inaba and Fujita (2006) only the pressure of a normal force can be displayed. With two motors as proposed by Minamizawa et al (2010) and Prattichizzo et al (2010), the belt can also induce a shear stress when the motors are moved in the same direction. These devices are very simple, compact, and light.…”
Section: Belt or Wire Tighteningmentioning
confidence: 99%