1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-2607(98)00023-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a double blind controlled clinical trial to evaluate the function of a Diabetes Advisory System: a feasible approach?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten articles described day-by-day advisory systems, [7][8][9]11,[15][16][17][18][19]21 while three described visit-by-visit systems. 12,14,20 From the technological point of view, eight papers tested telemedicine systems, as selfmonitoring data were sent to the hospital from the patient's house, generally using a modem or the phone. [7][8][9][15][16][17]20,21 The outcome parameters reported in the 16 articles measured health status, social functioning, patient's satisfaction, patient's compliance with the system, and the system technical performances (especially in the telemedicine articles).…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ten articles described day-by-day advisory systems, [7][8][9]11,[15][16][17][18][19]21 while three described visit-by-visit systems. 12,14,20 From the technological point of view, eight papers tested telemedicine systems, as selfmonitoring data were sent to the hospital from the patient's house, generally using a modem or the phone. [7][8][9][15][16][17]20,21 The outcome parameters reported in the 16 articles measured health status, social functioning, patient's satisfaction, patient's compliance with the system, and the system technical performances (especially in the telemedicine articles).…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, the sign test calculation was extended to all the retrieved studies, since it was meant to be a completion of a previously reported work. 5 On the other hand, the method of effect sizes was first applied to 13 of the available papers (i.e., 14 trials), [7][8][9][10][11][12][14][15][16][17][18][19]22 as in the others some needed data were missing, from standard deviations, to HbA1c before and/or after the intervention, in the cases and/or in the controls. As a further step, the method was applied to three subsets of the 13 papers: the decision support systems set, 7-9,11,12,14-19 the even narrower dayby-day advisory systems set, [7][8][9]11,[15][16][17][18][19] and the telemedicine systems set.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Critical regions for G = 36. The trajectory depicts the values of I and X for a meal disturbance of 20 g problem therefore consists of (10), (16), (17) and (13)- (15). This asymmetric formulation allows positive and negative values of x to have different effects in the objective function.…”
Section: Asymmetric Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include controllers based upon integrated square error cost function [24], insulin infusion protocols for hyperglycemic patients [12] and internal model controllers for an approximation of the detailed physiological model [35] and nonlinear feedforward-feedback controller, synthesized using feedback linearization [7]. Insulin dosage advisory systems, which are based upon using mathematical models [20] to predict the blood glucose variations, have also been proposed in the open literature and compared with the advice given in clinical practice [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a double blind randomized study in 12 poorly controlled subjects with type 1 diabetes admitted to hospital in Denmark to optimize insulin therapy, an average 1.9% reduction in HbA 1C was observed in the DIAS group (N=6) compared to 0.9% in the control group (N=6) [20]. The logistics and cost of running a double blind study contributed to the reduction of the studied population from 20 to 12 subjects.…”
Section: Off-line Adaptation}decision Support Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%