2004
DOI: 10.1002/acs.851
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Management of diabetes using adaptive control

Abstract: The review focuses on adaptive systems for insulin treatment in type 1 diabetes. The review consists of two parts. First, adaptive approaches are described, which exploit infrequent glucose measurements (four to seven measurements per day). Second, adaptive approaches are described, which exploit frequent or continuous glucose measurements (every hour or more often). Each part is further divided into two subparts separating off-line and on-line adaptive techniques. The latter represents treatment strategies, w… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
42
16
2
0

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
32
18
6

Relationship

0
56

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 56 publications

(35 citation statements)
references

References 100 publications

0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The set-up is that of a basal-bolus therapy, involving impulsive control variables, namely insulin shots and meal carbohydrates, administered several times over the course of the day at irregularly spaced time instants. We remind the reader in passing that this framework differs from most of the proposed strategies to manage diabetes in an automated fashion [4], [5], [21], [22], [23], [24] nevertheless, it is the most widespread approach among the diabetics to cure their disease and in the authors' opinion it represents a viable path worth pursuing and investigating. The parameters in the models are linked to clinical variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…The set-up is that of a basal-bolus therapy, involving impulsive control variables, namely insulin shots and meal carbohydrates, administered several times over the course of the day at irregularly spaced time instants. We remind the reader in passing that this framework differs from most of the proposed strategies to manage diabetes in an automated fashion [4], [5], [21], [22], [23], [24] nevertheless, it is the most widespread approach among the diabetics to cure their disease and in the authors' opinion it represents a viable path worth pursuing and investigating. The parameters in the models are linked to clinical variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…The set-up is that of a basal-bolus therapy, involving impulsive control variables, namely insulin injections and meal carbohydrates, administered several times over the course of the day at irregularly spaced time instants. We remind the reader in passing that this framework differs from most of the proposed strategies to manage diabetes in an automated fashion [9], [12], [13], [21], [22], [23] in which glycemia is regulated only with a continuous insulin infusion pump, neverthless, it is the most widespread approach among the diabetics to control their disease. Previous attempts at producing impulsive control signals include approximation of the continuous insulin signal from a model predictive controller [24], [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…So far, the problem of glycemia control has been addressed in a respectable number of papers, while exploiting various more or less sophisticated strategies starting from simple PID controllers [11][12][13], adaptive approaches [ [14][15][16], robust control [17], and concluding with the predictive control as perhaps the most promising one [18]. Some of the most significant and closely related works will be briefly examined in this section.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.