2023
DOI: 10.1075/lab.22051.arc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a contrastive hierarchy to formalize structural similarity as I-proximity in L3 phonology

Abstract: In this paper I argue that cross-linguistic similarity in third language acquisition is determined by a structural hierarchy of contrastive phonological features. Such an approach allows us formalize a predictive notion of I-proximity which also provides an explanatory model of L2, and L3 phonological knowledge (represented in an integrated I-grammar). The metrics of phonological similarity (i.e., structural not acoustic) are analogous to morphosyntactic similarity in that both morphosyntactic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. The English Contrastive Hierarchy I will not go into much detail as to the activity of the English features (and the role this could play in determining the acquisition path) as the focus of this article is on the initial stages of the acquisition of English interdental fricatives, and not on the restructuring stages of subsequent acquisition stages (see Archibald, 2023).…”
Section: The English Contrastive Hierarchymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. The English Contrastive Hierarchy I will not go into much detail as to the activity of the English features (and the role this could play in determining the acquisition path) as the focus of this article is on the initial stages of the acquisition of English interdental fricatives, and not on the restructuring stages of subsequent acquisition stages (see Archibald, 2023).…”
Section: The English Contrastive Hierarchymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the question arises as to how to assess overall similarity on each of the linguistic 'levels' of the hierarchy proposed by the TPM. For instance, how do we measure overall phonological similarity, what is the level of abstractness in such comparison (see Archibald, 2021Archibald, , 2023, and what should be given more 'weight' in such a summative assessment (see Archibald, 2017;Nelson et al, 2021 for a discussion)?…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%