2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12599-013-0302-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User, Use & Utility Research

Abstract: Business and Information Systems Engineering (BISE) is at a turning point: The ubiquity of information technology (IT) that we experience today in all areas of life leads to a fundamental shift in the BISE landscape and demands the individual user and his or her needs to be put at the center of all investigations. The increasing linkage of human and machine makes it necessary to adjust the perspective on value-chains, processes, methods and structures in BISE. Building on three core themes, the paper at hand d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The point of view of a single user is important, since we will take this view for the remainder of the paper. This is important, since an IS needs to be adopted and used to provide its value (DeLone & McLean, 1992;Brenner et al, 2014). Thus, following approaches like TAM (Davis, 1989;Davis et al, 1989;Venkatesh & Bala, 2008), Trust-TAM (Gefen et al, 2003b) and UTAUT (Venkatesh et al, 2003), we focus on the user perceptions and their importance in the context of IS use.…”
Section: Theory Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The point of view of a single user is important, since we will take this view for the remainder of the paper. This is important, since an IS needs to be adopted and used to provide its value (DeLone & McLean, 1992;Brenner et al, 2014). Thus, following approaches like TAM (Davis, 1989;Davis et al, 1989;Venkatesh & Bala, 2008), Trust-TAM (Gefen et al, 2003b) and UTAUT (Venkatesh et al, 2003), we focus on the user perceptions and their importance in the context of IS use.…”
Section: Theory Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such artifacts can take different forms such as conceptual blue prints, working software prototypes, instantiated processes and may be designed with the purpose of concrete (i.e., to solve a specific problem) and/or generic problem SPECIAL | TD-AWARD Tobias Mettler, Peter Rohner, Robert Winter GAIA 23/3 (2014): 272 -274 solving (i. e., to solve a class of problems). They are also designed for a specific user or user group, specific use scenarios, and with the aim to deliver some utility during its purposeful usage (Brenner et al 2014). Another purpose of our artifacts is to serve as boundary objects; as bridges between social and cultural worlds (Nicolini et al 2012).…”
Section: Artifacts As Boundary Objects For Bridging Social and Culturmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a new system to bring benefit to users, it is therefore crucial not only to know what are domain‐related pressing problems and corresponding functional solutions, but importantly also how the members of a domain perceive and interpret their world and respond to it (Ellison & Boyd, ). To that effect, we comprehend domain engineering less as an approach to engineer or increase reuse of artefacts, but rather as a way to engineering‐for‐use such that an individual and his or her worldview, language, tradition, and context are well ingrained into the design of a new system (Brenner et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%