User’s Guide to Nganasan Spoken Language Corpus

Wagner-Nagy, Beáta; Szeverényi, Sándor; Gusev, V. N.

doi:10.14232/wpcl.2018.1

Cited by 10 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At this point it should be remarked that a lot of ideas and principles of transcription and annotation go back to the Nganasan Spoken Language Corpus (NSLC) (Brykina et al 2018), a documentation of this are the respective user guidelines (Wagner-Nagy et al 2018). This holds especially true for the annotation principles and annotation schemes for the annotation of semantic roles (SeR), syntactic functions (SyF) and information status (IST), as will be shown in the respective sections.…”

Section: Transcription and Annotationmentioning

confidence: 99%

User’s Guide to INEL Dolgan Corpus

Däbritz¹

2020

Working Papers in Corpus Linguistics and Digital Technologies: Analyses and Methodology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Transcription and Annotationmentioning

confidence: 99%

User’s Guide to INEL Dolgan Corpus

Däbritz¹

2020

Working Papers in Corpus Linguistics and Digital Technologies: Analyses and Methodology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Many ideas and principles of transcription and annotation go back to the Nganasan Spoken Language Corpus (NSLC) (Brykina et al 2018), a documentation of which are the respective user guidelines (Wagner-Nagy et al 2018). This holds especially true for the annotation principles and annotation schemes for the annotation of semantic roles (SeR), syntactic functions (SyF) and information status (IST), as will be shown in the respective sections.…”

Section: Transcription and Annotationmentioning

confidence: 99%

User’s Guide to INEL Kamas Corpus

Arkhipov¹,

Däbritz²,

Gusev³

2020

Working Papers in Corpus Linguistics and Digital Technologies: Analyses and Methodology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

On the status of information structure markers

Däbritz

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper at hand deals with morphological marking of information structural relations from the perspective of North-Western Siberian languages. Given many items (morphemes as well as particles and clitics) which have been analyzed as markers of information structure in these languages, I try to discuss whether they indeed mark information structural relations or whether this supposed marking is rather a side effect of other functions expressed. In order to develop criteria for decision marking, I rely on the concepts of sufficiency as well as necessity and sufficient as well as necessary conditions, respectively. Additionally, I argue that the latter can be arranged hierarchically with respect to their reliability for the evaluation of potential markers of information structure, being intertwined with functional and transparency coding principles.

show abstract

User’s Guide to Nganasan Spoken Language Corpus

Cited by 10 publications

References 3 publications

User’s Guide to INEL Dolgan Corpus

User’s Guide to INEL Dolgan Corpus

User’s Guide to INEL Kamas Corpus

On the status of information structure markers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About