User’s Guide to INEL Kamas Corpus

Arkhipov, Alexandre; Däbritz, Chris Lasse; Gusev, V. N.

doi:10.14232/wpcl.2020.3

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With the exception of four fragmentarily preserved phonograph recordings (see Klumpp 2013) the Donner materials consist of the writings as published by A. J. Joki in KW. The Künnap materials, in contrast, consist of tape recordings that were fully transcribed only recently and published along with the Donner texts in the Hamburg INEL Kamas corpus (see Arkhipov et al 2019. Altogether there are 203 instances of bazoʔ in the texts, 20 in the Donner texts (19 in the published texts and one in the unpublished phonograph recordings 3 ), and 183 in the Künnap texts.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Kamas bāzoʔ ‘again’

Klumpp

2022

Siberica Et Uralica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article is an attempt to capture the functional profile of the Kamas repetitive adverb bazoʔ, which occurs with the four different meanings ‘again’, ‘in addition’, ‘in turn’, and ‘back again’. The adverb is a borrowing from South Siberian Turkic. It is attested across all documented periods of Kamas. In the latest period, the profile of the adverb changes at least in two domains. First, in repeated events with a differing given argument, the adverb finds a competitor in the Russian borrowing tože ‘also’. Second, while a repetitive-restitutive meaning is attested already in earlier texts, in late Kamas, bazoʔ appears also in counterdirectional meaning, which had been expressed earlier by the spatial adverb püʔdə ‘back’. For the present investigation all ca. 200 instances of bazoʔ in the older and younger Kamas texts have been considered. In addition to bazoʔ and tože, attention is also paid to another additive operator of Russian origin, iššo ‘still, more’.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Kamas bāzoʔ ‘again’

Klumpp

2022

Siberica Et Uralica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Existential, locative and possessive predication in Kamas

Däbritz,

Wagner-Nagy

2024

JUL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper describes and analyses existential, locative and possessive predications in Kamas. Starting from a functional-semantic perspective, we show that the three types of predications share many features, but they also exhibit some important differences. Given that two layers of Kamas can be distinguished, we demonstrate that the reactivated Kamas of the last speaker, Klavdiya Plotnikova, exhibits some peculiarities which can be explained partly by Russian influence. The most important result of the study is that the boundaries between the three predication types are rather fluid in Kamas, whereas the distinction between affirmative and negative clauses is morphosyntactically unambiguously manifested. This polarity split, given that it is seldom recognised in the general literature, may provide important implications for linguistic typology and theory.

show abstract

INEL Corpora General Transcription and Annotation Principles

Arkhipov

2020

Working Papers in Corpus Linguistics and Digital Technologies: Analyses and Methodology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

User’s Guide to INEL Kamas Corpus

Cited by 3 publications

References 5 publications

Kamas bāzoʔ ‘again’

Kamas bāzoʔ ‘again’

Existential, locative and possessive predication in Kamas

INEL Corpora General Transcription and Annotation Principles

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About