User Perceptions and Experiences of a Handheld 12-Lead Electrocardiographic Device in a Clinical Setting: Usability Evaluation

Abstract

Background Cardiac arrhythmias are a leading cause of death. The mainstay method for diagnosing arrhythmias (eg, atrial fibrillation) and cardiac conduction disorders (eg, prolonged corrected QT interval [QTc]) is by using 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG). Handheld 12-lead ECG devices are emerging in the market. In tandem with emerging technology options, evaluations of device usability should go beyond validation of the device in a controlled laboratory setting and assess user perceptions and experiences, which are crucial for successful implementation in clinical practice. Objective This study aimed to evaluate clinician and patient perceptions and experiences, regarding the usability of a handheld 12-lead ECG device compared to a conventional 12-lead ECG machine, and generalizability of this user-centered approach. Methods International Organization for Standardization Guidelines on Usability and the Technology Acceptance Model were integrated to form the framework for this study, which was conducted in outpatient clinics and cardiology wards at Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia. Each patient underwent 2 ECGs (1 by each device) in 2 postures (supine and standing) acquired in random sequence. The times taken by clinicians to acquire the first ECG (efficiency) using the devices were analyzed using linear regression. Electrocardiographic parameters (QT interval, QTc interval, heart rate, PR interval, QRS interval) and participant satisfaction surveys were collected. Device reliability was assessed by evaluating the mean difference of QTc measurements within ±15 ms, intraclass correlation coefficient, and level of agreement of the devices in detecting atrial fibrillation and prolonged QTc. Clinicians’ perceptions and feedback were assessed with semistructured interviews based on the Technology Acceptance Model. Results A total of 100 patients (age: mean 57.9 years, SD 15.2; sex: male: n=64, female n=36) and 11 clinicians (experience acquiring ECGs daily or weekly 10/11, 91%) participated, and 783 ECGs were acquired. Mean differences in QTc measurements of both handheld and conventional devices were within ±15 ms with high intraclass correlation coefficients (range 0.90-0.96), and the devices had a good level of agreement in diagnosing atrial fibrillation and prolonged QTc (κ=0.68-0.93). Regardless of device, QTc measurements when patients were standing were longer duration than QTc measurements when patients were supine. Clinicians’ ECG acquisition times improved with usage ( P <.001). Clinicians reported that device characteristics (small size, light weight, portability, and wireless ECG transmission) were highly desired features. Most clinicians agreed that the handheld device could be used for clinician-led mass screening with enhancement in efficiency by increasing user training. Regardless of device, patients reported that they felt comfortable when they were connect...

Correlation Between Healthcare Practitioners Education and the Usability of Precordial ECG SafOne

“…7 According to the user-centred design approach, new health tool innovations, including ECG SafOne, require evaluating the use of the tool in the field to see the efficiency and quality of the equipment used by health workers. 8,9 One of the studies on ECG modification by Wong et al 10 evaluated their invention by health workers to acquire feedback on the tool and found it significantly helpful. Therefore, ECG SafOne also requires to assess and evaluate its usability and functionality in practice.…”

Experiences of health professionals towards using mobile electrocardiogram (ECG) technology: A qualitative systematic review

“…Mobile ECG technology consists of a device and application enabling the recording and review of ECGs anywhere, anytime, having a positive impact on accessibility at the point of care. Registered health professionals from a variety of disciplines are increasingly using mobile ECG technology, the greatest benefits being demonstrated in contexts where time efficiency and clinical decision making are crucial (Wong et al, 2021).…”

“…There may be comfort and familiarity of staff using existing non-mobile ECG technology within hospital settings, however, the simplicity of mobile ECG technologies has been shown to increase health professionals' motivation, comprehension, and self-efficacy in relation to AF screening (Wong et al, 2021). Importance was placed on the availability of staff, training, motivation, support tools integrated with current practice software systems to inform the doctor/prescriber of the ECG result and provide best practice AF management recommendations.…”