LMNA-related heart disease was associated with a high incidence of phenotypic progression and adverse arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic events over long-term follow-up. The index cardiac phenotype did not predict adverse events. Genetic diagnosis and subsequent follow-up, including anticipatory planning for therapies to prevent sudden death and manage HF, is warranted.
Human long-lasting PerAF is characterized by heterogeneous and unstable patterns of activation including wavefronts, transient rotational circuits, and disorganized activity.
Sinus node dysfunction (SND) and atrial arrhythmias frequently coexist and interact to initiate and perpetuate each other. Atrial arrhythmias are present in 40% to 70% of patients at the time of diagnosis of SND.1,2 However, the complex relationship between the 2 remains ill defined. The documented degenerative changes in atrial myocardial structure relating to SND are primarily right atrial. Yet, the majority of triggers and substrates for atrial fibrillation (AF) originate from the left atrium. Although progressive biatrial fibrosis is a feature in patients with structural heart disease and in senescence, paroxysmal AF that occurs in patients with no structural heart disease may have a different pathophysiology. SND associated with this latter condition is likely to be primarily a result of electric remodeling and potentially reversible. The time course of the progression of SND and AF 3 and their individual clinical manifestations also vary depending on the underlying pathology. The purpose of this review is to summarize the state of our knowledge of sinus node (SN) function in both health and disease, and to understand the complex relationship between SN disease and atrial arrhythmias. Structure and Functional Components of the Sinus NodeIn the adult human heart, the SN is a crescent-shaped structure 1 to 2 cm long and 0.5 cm wide that lies at the junction of the superior vena cava with the right atrium and lies along the sulcus terminalis. The node itself is composed of clusters of pacemaker myocytes arranged in parallel rows with short digitations that frequently anastomose with the surrounding atrial tissue. The specialized pacemaker cells are interspersed with nerves and capillaries and scaffolded by dense connective tissue to form the SN pacemaker complex. The caudal portion fragments to merge with the atrial myocardium. The lack of a distinct encapsulation and the radiating sinoatrial connections explains the lack of a single breakthrough of the sinus impulse. The position of the leading pacemaker site shifts within the node and varies with sympathetic and vagal stimulation. 3The SN pacemaker cells are interspersed with interstitial collagen that varies in extent as a function of older age. 4 Collagen content increases from 24% in the infant to 70% in the adult heart.5 The fibrous matrix with surrounding fatty insulation of the SN together with distinct electrophysiological properties (see below) provides insulation and prevents the depression of pacemaker automaticity from the hyperpolarizing electric load of the surrounding atrial myocardium. 6 Multiple currents are involved in the activation of the SN. The predominant inward current in the center of the node is I CaL . Action potentials with slow upstrokes initiated in the center spreads peripherally and into the musculature of the terminal crest. However, in the periphery of the node, I Na is operative and is necessary for providing sufficient inward current to depolarize the larger mass of atrial tissue. Delayed rectifier potassium currents facili...
Background: Variants in the cardiomyocyte-specific RNA splicing factor RBM20 have been linked to familial cardiomyopathy but the causative genetic architecture and clinical consequences of this disease are incompletely defined. Methods and Results: To define the genetic architecture of RBM20 cardiomyopathy, we first established a database of RBM20 variants associated with cardiomyopathy and compared these to variants observed in the general population with respect to their location in the RBM20 coding transcript. We identified two regions significantly enriched for cardiomyopathy-associated variants in exons 9 and 11. We then assembled a registry of 74 patients with RBM20 variants from 8 institutions across the world (44 index cases and 30 from cascade testing). This RBM20 patient registry revealed highly prevalent family history of sudden cardiac death (51%) and cardiomyopathy (72%) among index cases, and a high prevalence of composite arrhythmias (including AF, NSVT, ICD discharge and sudden cardiac arrest, 43%). Patients harboring variants in cardiomyopathy-enriched regions identified by our variant database analysis were enriched for these findings. Further, these characteristics were more prevalent in the RBM20 registry than in large cohorts of patients with DCM and titin (TTNtv) cardiomyopathy, and not significantly different from a cohort of patients with Lamin A/C associated (LMNA) cardiomyopathy. Conclusions: Our data establish RBM20 cardiomyopathy as a highly penetrant and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. These findings underline the importance of arrhythmia surveillance and family screening in this disease and represent the first step in defining the genetic architecture of RBM20 disease causality on a population level. −/− mice demonstrate pro-arrhythmic calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum 45. Parikh et al.
PVAI is an effective strategy for the prevention of AF in the majority of patients with PAF. Maintenance of SR requires repeat procedure or continuation of AADs in a significant proportion of patients. After maintenance of sinus rhythm 1-year post-PVAI, a minority of patients will subsequently develop late recurrence of AF.
Elevated BNP and NT-proBNP levels identify patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery at high risk of cardiac mortality, all-cause mortality, and MACE.
Background: An accurate estimation of the risk of life-threatening (LT) ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA) in patients with LMNA mutations is crucial to select candidates for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Methods: We included 839 adult patients with LMNA mutations, including 660 from a French nationwide registry in the development sample, and 179 from other countries, referred to 5 tertiary centers for cardiomyopathies, in the validation sample. LTVTA was defined as a) sudden cardiac death or b) ICD-treated or hemodynamically unstable VTA. The prognostic model was derived using Fine-Gray's regression model. The net reclassification was compared with current clinical practice guidelines. The results are presented as means (standard deviation) or medians [interquartile range]. Results: We included 444 patients 40.6 (14.1) years of age in the derivation sample and 145 patients 38.2 (15.0) years in the validation sample, of whom 86 (19.3%) and 34 (23.4%) suffered LTVTA over 3.6 [1.0-7.2] and 5.1 [2.0-9.3] years of follow-up, respectively. Predictors of LTVTA in the derivation sample were: male sex, non-missense LMNA mutation, 1st degree and higher atrioventricular block, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, and left ventricular ejection fraction. In the derivation sample, C-index (95% CI) of the model was 0.776 (0.711-0.842) and calibration slope 0.827. In the external validation sample, the C-index was 0.800 (0.642-0.959) and calibration slope 1.082 (95% CI, 0.643-1.522). A 5-year estimated risk threshold ≥7% predicted 96.2% of LTVTA and net reclassified 28.8% of patients with LTVTA compared with the guidelines-based approach. Conclusions: Compared to the current standard of care, this risk prediction model for LTVTA in laminopathies facilitated significantly the choice of ICD candidates. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT03058185.
In a contemporary cohort of patients with scar-related VT undergoing RFCA, EM occurred in 5% of cases. Clinical and procedural variables indicating poorer clinical status (low LVEF, chronic kidney disease, VT storm, and unmappable VTs) and post-procedural VT recurrence may predict EM. Identification of such features may prompt early consideration for hemodynamic support or other care to help mitigate later potential complications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.