1999
DOI: 10.1108/03074809910248537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User‐oriented evaluation of library and information centre Web sites

Abstract: A great deal of effort has been invested in promoting high quality Web pages in general. Long lists of criteria of “good” Web pages have been proposed. So far, not many studies have been dealing with the specific problems of library and information centre Web sites. Among these studies the majority have rather been using quantitative methods. What is needed, however, are user‐oriented evaluation studies using qualitative methods dealing specifically with Web sites of libraries and information centres. An ongoi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that several of the libraries were being reviewed or redesigned was consistent with recommendations from researchers such as Gilutz and Nielsen (2002) and Clausen (1999). All of the academic libraries Shropshire (2003) studied were undergoing alterations.…”
Section: Additional Commentssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The finding that several of the libraries were being reviewed or redesigned was consistent with recommendations from researchers such as Gilutz and Nielsen (2002) and Clausen (1999). All of the academic libraries Shropshire (2003) studied were undergoing alterations.…”
Section: Additional Commentssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The second most common was researching other library web sites as recommended by Clausen (1999) and Song (2003).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Survey Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were unable to locate an evaluation case study that focused on the navigation effectiveness of a taxonomy's hierarchical structure and categories. Many studies explored the advantages and disadvantages of navigation as an alternative to key word searching (Borgman, Hirsh, Gallagher, & Walter, ; Lee & Olson, ; Beheshti, Large, & Tam, ), and usability issues involved in website navigation (Clausen, ; Seock & Norton, ; Luong & Liew, ; Harding, Szakacs, & Parry, ). Although some cases involved taxonomies, they focused on the interfaces implemented with those taxonomies (Uddin & Janecek, ), or preferences for online displays of taxonomies (Large, Beheshti, Clement, Tabatabaei, & Tam, ).…”
Section: Review Of Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for designing such a questionnaire was expressed, for example, by Clausen (1999), but the very interesting and inspiring tool he constructed to evaluate Danish library Web sites was dominated by criteria regarding the form and usability of the Web sites. The need for designing such a questionnaire was expressed, for example, by Clausen (1999), but the very interesting and inspiring tool he constructed to evaluate Danish library Web sites was dominated by criteria regarding the form and usability of the Web sites.…”
Section: Searching For Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%