1998
DOI: 10.1108/01435129810232027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User consultation in public library services

Abstract: The idea that user consultation is central to effectiveness, quality and efficiency is still relatively new in many public service organisations, including libraries. This paper reviews the methods available and describes the results of a survey of all UK public library authorities to find out what methods they employ, their effectiveness, and in which context they are used. Recommendations are also made for improving user consultation within libraries.User consultation in public library services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of this aspect of community engagement work in public libraries tend to focus around the consultation of users (often specific groups of users such as young people or people from ethnic minorities) in decisions relating to the design or redesign of library buildings or specific areas within them. User or public consultation has long been a feature of public library service management although the effectiveness of some of the more conventional methods used has been questioned (see, for example, Morris and Barron, 1998). Probably as a result of criticisms of techniques relied upon in the past, and as a response to government demands for wider and deeper engagement, library services have been experimenting with more innovative ways of gathering users' views and opinions often as a basis for making decisions related to library space.…”
Section: Community Involvement In One‐off Decision Making and In Relation To Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of this aspect of community engagement work in public libraries tend to focus around the consultation of users (often specific groups of users such as young people or people from ethnic minorities) in decisions relating to the design or redesign of library buildings or specific areas within them. User or public consultation has long been a feature of public library service management although the effectiveness of some of the more conventional methods used has been questioned (see, for example, Morris and Barron, 1998). Probably as a result of criticisms of techniques relied upon in the past, and as a response to government demands for wider and deeper engagement, library services have been experimenting with more innovative ways of gathering users' views and opinions often as a basis for making decisions related to library space.…”
Section: Community Involvement In One‐off Decision Making and In Relation To Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morris and Barron (1998), Cullen (2001) and Woodberry (2006) claim that measuring customer satisfaction is the most commonly used indicator of library performance. However, it is possible to receive high scores in customer satisfaction surveys and still not be fulfilling the expectations of library customers (Audit Commission, 2002, paragraph 26).…”
Section: Service Quality and Customer Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly important in the discussion on the use of service quality instruments in the context of library and information services, as the service quality scores can be construed as indicators of customer satisfaction (Woodberry, 2006). Morris & Barron (1998), Cullen (2001) and Woodberry (2006) claim that measuring customer satisfaction is the most commonly used indicator of library performance.…”
Section: Service Quality and Customer Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 To determine those needs, it is vital that library staff observe the facility while it is being used. This observation can be applied to the facility evaluation plan to justify the continued operation of the facility to meet the needs of the library service population.…”
Section: N Research Purposementioning
confidence: 99%