2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmyco.2016.10.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of IS6110-based restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis in fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in North India

Abstract: In this study, we found that the majority of isolates were having multiple copy numbers of IS6110 element and showed a very diverse pattern. These results showed that the IS6110-RFLP analysis is still a promising genotyping method and has good discriminatory power to differentiate strains of MTB isolates in India.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MTB molecular markers promoted the development of reproducible genotyping methods [4], including insertion sequence 6110 (IS6110), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing [5], spacer oligonucleotide typing (spoligotyping) [6], single nucleotide polymorphism analysis [7],mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit variable number tandem repeats (MIRU-VNTRs) assessment [8], large sequence polymorphism (LSP) typing [9], and genome [10] sequence analysis. IS6110-RFLP has been the gold standard for genotyping MTB since 1993, but this procedure is time consuming, technically demanding and labour intensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MTB molecular markers promoted the development of reproducible genotyping methods [4], including insertion sequence 6110 (IS6110), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing [5], spacer oligonucleotide typing (spoligotyping) [6], single nucleotide polymorphism analysis [7],mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit variable number tandem repeats (MIRU-VNTRs) assessment [8], large sequence polymorphism (LSP) typing [9], and genome [10] sequence analysis. IS6110-RFLP has been the gold standard for genotyping MTB since 1993, but this procedure is time consuming, technically demanding and labour intensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though many have raised a question of using this IS6110 marker in India due to its presence of either in low copy or its complete absence from the genome of MTB the study from North India have proved the utility of IS6110-RFLP a promising genotyping method with good discriminatory power to differentiate strains in MTB isolates in India. 16 This insertion element IS6110 is present in multiple copies and can range from 0-25. 12 Among the 100 isolates that were tested by RFLP in this study, with a male gender being higher than the female in the ratio of 11:9 where globally more men are seen to be diagnosed with TB than women with a ratio of approximately 60:40 between men and women due to various reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%