2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01629-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of calcium scoring using electron beam computed tomography and noninvasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other studies have demonstrated modest sensitivity (80%-85%) when using calcium score cut point values of 45-310 [26,27] . Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and negative predictive values were high for CCTA detection of significant and severe coronary stenoses on a persegment level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, other studies have demonstrated modest sensitivity (80%-85%) when using calcium score cut point values of 45-310 [26,27] . Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and negative predictive values were high for CCTA detection of significant and severe coronary stenoses on a persegment level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In clinical routine, a wide range of examination protocols with varying spatial resolution are used for coronary calcium scoring. While most studies use a slice thickness of 3 mm (z-axis resolution), the FOV size varies from 180×180 mm 2 to 430×430 mm 2 [8,[17][18][19][20][21], resulting in a broad bandwidth of spatial resolution in the x/y-plane. Some studies even used different FOV sizes in the same patient group [20,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noncalcified plaque can also be visualized by MDCT but requires the aid of injected contrast-enhancing dyes, and individual plaque components cannot be distinguished and quantified. Studies have been conducted to understand the differences in signal between stable and unstable angina 57,58 and within plaques to differentiate composition, 59 but CT is not yet a reliable source for quantifying calcification relative to other plaque components.…”
Section: Electron Beam Ctmentioning
confidence: 99%