2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2016.06.126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Useful and little-known applications of the Least Square Method and some consequences of covariances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculations of the effect size (dz) were performed by G*Power version 3.1.9.7 [30]. All the fitting procedures were carried out using the least square method [31], where the best fit parameters correspond to the minimum χ 2 , defined as:…”
Section: E Variables Statistical Analyses and Fitting Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The calculations of the effect size (dz) were performed by G*Power version 3.1.9.7 [30]. All the fitting procedures were carried out using the least square method [31], where the best fit parameters correspond to the minimum χ 2 , defined as:…”
Section: E Variables Statistical Analyses and Fitting Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 95% confidence intervals of the fitted functions were assumed as ∼ 2σ f . In some model estimates, standard uncertainty propagation techniques were also applied [31].…”
Section: E Variables Statistical Analyses and Fitting Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, there is a vast literature in statistics applied to physics on the problem of aggregating correlated measures of the same quantity to reduce the noise [13,15,25,26]. In particular, the method called BLUE is equivalent to the model-aware benchmark that we present in Section 3.2 [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where k max = 1 for Mexico and Russia, 2 for Brazil, UK and India and 3 for USA. The propagation of the uncertainties of the best fit parameters to the reconstructed infection curve took into account the full co-variance matrix V b, as similarly described in [37], with the vector G ′ m being defined as:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%