2016
DOI: 10.32800/abc.2016.39.0207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of wild–caught individuals as a key factor for success in vertebrate translocations

Abstract: Use of wild-caught individuals as a key factor for success in vertebrate translocations.-Success of vertebrate translocations is crucial to improve efficacy and efficiency of conservation actions but it is often difficult to assess because negative results (failed translocations) are seldom published. We developed surveys and sent them to heads of conservation services in three major Spanish Mediterranean regions. The purpose of our surveys was to determine which methodological factor that could easily be impl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Post-release effects (Armstrong & Reynolds, 2012) result in reduced survival during the acclimation phase, and can vary depending on age, sex, behavior and source population (Armstrong et al, 2017). Captive-bred animals generally fare worse than wild-born counterparts after release (Letty, Marchandeau & Aubineau, 2007;Rummel et al, 2016). Yet captive-bred animals may be an essential resource if wildborn individuals are unavailable or if the viability of remnant populations would be unacceptably compromised by extraction of animals for translocation (Todd, Jenkins & Bearlin, 2002;Todd & Linterman, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-release effects (Armstrong & Reynolds, 2012) result in reduced survival during the acclimation phase, and can vary depending on age, sex, behavior and source population (Armstrong et al, 2017). Captive-bred animals generally fare worse than wild-born counterparts after release (Letty, Marchandeau & Aubineau, 2007;Rummel et al, 2016). Yet captive-bred animals may be an essential resource if wildborn individuals are unavailable or if the viability of remnant populations would be unacceptably compromised by extraction of animals for translocation (Todd, Jenkins & Bearlin, 2002;Todd & Linterman, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Translocations of G . aculeatus proved successful elsewhere [50, 85, 94]. Future studies will have to determine whether the low recapture at the stocking area within the Pego-Oliva Marsh Nature Reserve is due to dispersal through the surrounding wetland [15], to physiochemical constraints or even the use of captive bred individuals [94].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chosen animals must be registered in the International Studbook and recommended for breeding by EEP. Captive-bred animals generally fare worse than wild-born counterparts after release (�harkikh & Yasynetska, 2005;Letty et al, 2007;Rummel et al, 2016). Until 2015, there were no large nature (semi-)reserves for wild horses Przewalski's horses in Russia.…”
Section: Selection Of Foundersmentioning
confidence: 99%