Use of water of spring wheat on the Great Plains /

Cole, John S.; Chilcott, E. C.; Mathews, O. R.

doi:10.5962/bhl.title.108386

Cited by 9 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A summary of the average transpiration rates for all the series is given, in Table 5. The purpose of such a summary is twofold: (1) to jaBfgnt flu* data for fj^fn of the 1*111*% mnyifs for examination *n*i comparison; and (2) to place the species in groups on the basis of their relative liaiitifiiration rate, as uhuwu in the following classification.…”

Section: Different Series Comparedmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparison of the transpiration rates of twenty-one deciduous fruit species / by Victor W. Kelley.

Kelley¹

1930

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Different Series Comparedmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparison of the transpiration rates of twenty-one deciduous fruit species / by Victor W. Kelley.

Kelley¹

1930

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Warrington et al (1977) reported on the effects of temperature during different growth stages on wheat yields and high a:ir temperatures could be expected to reduce the period of grain filling. Figure 4 illustrates a grailn-dry matter yield relationship based on data from the following areas: USDA dryland report (Cole and Mathews, 1923) for wheat (mostly Kubanka durum wheat) in the Southern High Plains; the Bushland area (Amarillo, TX, Dalhart, TX, and Tucumcari, NM); the High Plains to North Dakota; and from two recent studies [Waddington et al (1986[Waddington et al ( , 1987] designed to examine the breeding advances in yield from bread and durum wheats, respectively, conducted at the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) in Mexico. The line illustrated in Fig.…”

Section: Winter Wheatmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The line illustrated in Fig. 4 is the linear regression for the data from Cole and Mathews ( 1923) and Waddington et al (1986) only. This relationship explained over 97% of the variation in the two diverse data sets with a standard error of the estimate of 0.33 Mg ha-1 • Both the slope and intercept were significantly different (0.05 level) from zero.…”

Section: Winter Wheatmentioning

confidence: 99%

Grain, Dry Matter Yield Relationships for Winter Wheat and Grain Sorghum—Southern High Plains

Howell

1990

Agronomy Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Grain yield of cereal crops is closely associated to the aerial (above ground) dry matter yield, but predictions of grain yield based on model estimates of dry matter yield are often inaccurate due to variations in the assumed harvest index. This study analyzed the relationship between grain yield and aerial dry matter yield from published studies for winter wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.)] and grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) conducted at Bushland, TX in the Southern High Plains. Harvest index (HI) was defined and determined as the slope of the linear relationship between Yd, plant grain yield in Mg ha−1 on a dry basis, and DM, aerial (field) dry matter yield in Mg ha−1, as contrasted to the traditional definition of HI as the ratio YdDM. Simple linear relationships had coefficients of determination of 0.95 for the seven grain sorghum experiments and 0.75 for the five winter wheat experiments at Bushland and standard errors of the estimates of 0.47 Mg ha−1 and 0.63 Mg ha−1, respectively. The HI of winter wheat and grain sorghum at Bushland was 0.35 and 0.47, respectively, and largely unaffected by fertility, water use, row spacing, and many other cultural practices like tillage and profile modification, and growing season environment. The linear regressions indicated a significant (0.05 probability level) intercept value of −0.53 Mg ha−1 for grain sorghum while the intercept value 0.16 Mg ha−1 for winter wheat was not significant (0.05 probability level).

show abstract

“…The correction varies from xero for impervious areas with out lakes or ground-water, up to several inches depth on the drainage-basin for areas with deep JSJII, abundant ground-water, or with large lakes or snow-fields. From field-studies, COLE,* • MATTHEWS, and CHILCOTT [5] found, in the western Mississippi Valley, from one to three inches :( *ater were abstracted from previously stored soil-moisture during the crop-season on lands planted to spring wheat. This was equivalent to 20 to 40 per cent of the total water used by the crop.…”

Section: Milk River Rises In Alberta Province Canada and Dischargesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hydrologic interrelations between lands and oceans

Horton

1943

Eos Trans. AGU

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rainfall in a given locality is governed by two sets of factors: (1) Hydrodynamic factors, such as topography and orographic conditions, which, together with atmospheric circulation, general and local, determine the occurrence and frequency of ascending air‐masses; (2) moisture‐supply. Either of these factors may be adequate to produce rain but if the other is deficient, little or no rain occurs. Air‐masses rich in moisture pass in summer from the Pacific Ocean over the coastal plains of California, producing little or no rain until forced above the condensation‐level by the coastal mountain ranges.

show abstract

Use of water of spring wheat on the Great Plains /

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

A comparison of the transpiration rates of twenty-one deciduous fruit species / by Victor W. Kelley.

A comparison of the transpiration rates of twenty-one deciduous fruit species / by Victor W. Kelley.

Grain, Dry Matter Yield Relationships for Winter Wheat and Grain Sorghum—Southern High Plains

Hydrologic interrelations between lands and oceans

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About