2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbe.2018.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the surface electromyography for a quantitative trend validation of estimated muscle forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings of a general better agreement between modelling approaches and EMG in the shank than thigh muscles is, mostly, in agreement with previous findings of Zuk et al [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings of a general better agreement between modelling approaches and EMG in the shank than thigh muscles is, mostly, in agreement with previous findings of Zuk et al [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…more dependent on particular characteristics of individual muscles (i.e., lever arm, cross sectional area) rather than estimation technique. Zuk et al [17], therefore, concluded that further research needs to focus on the force-sharing problem (which muscle is favoured above the other) and the development of cost functions describing motor control strategies (perception of the environment and consequential motor variability) more closely, which means that more effort needs to be undertaken to improve subject-specific musculoskeletal models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These four studies demonstrate variability both between individuals and across muscles, similar to our results. The best-represented muscles during gait were the plantar flexors, while the worst represented muscles were the knee extensors and hamstrings, consistent with our results for both CP and TD (Heintz and Gutierrez-Farewik, 2007;Blazkiewicz, 2013;Zuk et al, 2018b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The calculated metabolic rate of muscles was verified to demonstrate the real metabolic tendency [51]. The total rate of energy expenditure expressed in • −1 for a muscle was the sum of the activation heat rate, the maintenance heat rate, the shortening heat rate, the work rate, and the heat dissipated rate of a muscular contraction [52]. To compute the gross metabolic cost, the mass of each muscle needed to be gained as a critical parameter according to the metabolic model = • • / (6) Where ρ = 1059.7 / 3 was muscle density, was the maximum isometric force, was the optimal length of the muscle fibers in the model [53], and σ was the specific tension of each muscle which could be taken as 0.25 in the Gait2354 Model.…”
Section: H Muscle Metabolic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%