2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2005.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the De La Caffinière Prosthesis in Rheumatoid Trapeziometacarpal Destruction

Abstract: This study evaluated the outcome of the de la Caffinière prosthesis in patients with an inflammatory arthropathy affecting the trapeziometacarpal joint. The procedure was performed in 57 thumbs for rheumatoid arthritis (41 cases), juvenile chronic arthritis (ten cases), psoriatic arthritis (four cases) and other inflammatory joint diseases (two cases). Survival analysis with a revision procedure or radiographic implant failure as end points was performed. Five loosened cups and two permanently dislocated prost… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Outcome variables like pain were not reported in four studies [3,4,7,13]. Four of the studies used visual analogue scores (VAS) [5,9,14,17] and seven used some form of grading system for the pain. Assessment of functional capabilities was documented in only five studies [9,10,12,14,17].…”
Section: Outcome Criteria and Outcome Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Outcome variables like pain were not reported in four studies [3,4,7,13]. Four of the studies used visual analogue scores (VAS) [5,9,14,17] and seven used some form of grading system for the pain. Assessment of functional capabilities was documented in only five studies [9,10,12,14,17].…”
Section: Outcome Criteria and Outcome Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four of the studies used visual analogue scores (VAS) [5,9,14,17] and seven used some form of grading system for the pain. Assessment of functional capabilities was documented in only five studies [9,10,12,14,17]. Patient satisfaction was not documented in 11 studies, good/excellent/fair/poor grading was used in two studies [13,14] and VAS was used in the remaining two studies [5,9].…”
Section: Outcome Criteria and Outcome Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations