Soil Contamination - Threats and Sustainable Solutions 2021
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.94525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Swine Manure in Agriculture in Southern Brazil: Fertility or Potential Contamination?

Abstract: A major challenge in agricultural production systems is the maximization of resources used to promote the development of crops with a minimum of environmental impact. In this sense, the use of fertilizers of animal origin has great potential to promote the improvement of soil properties. In southern Brazil, swine manure (SM) is widely used in agricultural areas, allowing nutrient cycling within pig units and reducing costs for chemical fertilizers. Much of this manure is applied in liquid form (PS), but other … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(179 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have shown divergent results for the effect of PS application to the soil surface on C and N contents and soil aggregation [19,26,27,29,37,66,71,72], which were probably due to differences in PS rates, initial soil characteristic, tillage system, and evaluation time. Moreover, according to Benedet et al [25] long-term application of high PS rates can be a risk of contamination to soils and surface waters, mainly due to losses by runoff, and subsurface, by leaching. Basso et al [73] reported that the use of low PS rates (20 and 40 m 3 ha −1 ) minimizes N losses by volatilization; and N-NO 3 − leachate, despite little being expressed when compared to the amounts added by PS applications, can surpass the concentration limits for groundwater quality [74].…”
Section: And N In Aggregatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies have shown divergent results for the effect of PS application to the soil surface on C and N contents and soil aggregation [19,26,27,29,37,66,71,72], which were probably due to differences in PS rates, initial soil characteristic, tillage system, and evaluation time. Moreover, according to Benedet et al [25] long-term application of high PS rates can be a risk of contamination to soils and surface waters, mainly due to losses by runoff, and subsurface, by leaching. Basso et al [73] reported that the use of low PS rates (20 and 40 m 3 ha −1 ) minimizes N losses by volatilization; and N-NO 3 − leachate, despite little being expressed when compared to the amounts added by PS applications, can surpass the concentration limits for groundwater quality [74].…”
Section: And N In Aggregatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in soil chemical [24,25], physical [16,26,27], and biological [28][29][30] attributes have been found with application of PS, with positive effects on soil quality, and crop yields [10,31,32]. These benefits are mainly due to increases in organic matter contents, which favor soil aggregation and availability of nutrients to plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several meta-analyses have emphasized the benefits of animal manure application on crop yields and chemical, physical and biological soil attributes [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Animal manure of many kinds are expected to improve soil quality and crop yields on organic production systems, where mineral fertilizers are avoided, but also in intensive agricultural production systems [14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of animal manure as fertilizer for annual crops is not always a viable option in agricultural production areas because collection, preparation and distribution of manure can be expensive when transporting over long distances is necessary [3,15,24,25]. However, in cattle, swine and poultry producing regions, accumulated manure is a reality that has to be managed [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation