2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.0c02684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Standard Addition to Quantify In Situ FTIR Reaction Data

Abstract: FTIR spectroscopy is a common in situ reaction monitoring technique used in modern academic and industrial environments. The FTIR signals collected during the course of a reaction are proportional to the concentration of the reaction components but not intrinsically quantitative. To make FTIR data quantitative, precalibration or offline analyses of reaction samples are required, which diminishes the unique benefits of in situ reaction monitoring techniques. Herein, we report the use of standard addition as a c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This requires multiple data points of concentration vs signal to acquire the slope. Instead, we took advantage of our in situ reaction monitoring technique and used standard addition 24 as an internal calibration method to transform signal (peak area) into concentrations (Figures S6 and S7 in the Supporting Information). However, the standard addition method requires accurate reaction volume measurements.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires multiple data points of concentration vs signal to acquire the slope. Instead, we took advantage of our in situ reaction monitoring technique and used standard addition 24 as an internal calibration method to transform signal (peak area) into concentrations (Figures S6 and S7 in the Supporting Information). However, the standard addition method requires accurate reaction volume measurements.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time taken for the reaction to complete for a range of substrates is given ( Scheme 3 ). The use of the standard addition method (see the Supporting Information (SI): Section 1.3.3 ) 52 allowed for the quantification of the starting materials and products allowing rapid and accurate concentration analysis for the reactions. Off-line quantitative 19 F NMR analysis of the reactions confirmed the in situ measurements showing quantitative conversion of the benzoyl chloride starting material; a >99% contained 19 F NMR yield of acyl fluoride was calculated for all substrates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve this, internal calibration was performed via automated standard additions of starting materials before and after each reaction to account for matrix effects. [12,18] Concentrations of intermediates and products could then be calculated using mass balance (Section 1.5 in Supporting Information). This requires exact knowledge of the volume changes caused by each reagent's addition and/or aliquot removal, which were tracked by our system.…”
Section: Chemistry-methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After performing the reaction, our system converted the acquired peak area versus time data into concentration versus time data for species observed via HPLC (6). To achieve this, internal calibration was performed via automated standard additions of starting materials before and after each reaction to account for matrix effects [12,18] . Concentrations of intermediates and products could then be calculated using mass balance (Section 1.5 in Supporting Information).…”
Section: Instrumentation and Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%