2008
DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of specified critical periods of different congenital abnormalities instead of the first trimester concept

Abstract: The use of specified critical periods of different congenital abnormalities seems to be more scientific-based than the previously accepted methods for the evaluation of different exposure time windows. Thus this new and feasible approach is recommended for the controlled epidemiological studies in the future after an international consensus in the specified critical periods of different congenital abnormalities and other methodological issues.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no information on dosage or length of exposure to SSRIsBerard et al [37] suggested that the teratogenic effect of paroxetine may be limited to higher doses (25mg/day). We assumed, as is customary, that the relevant exposure window was the first trimester (as these are the available EUROCAT data) but this window is wider than the sensitive period for many congenital anomalies, some congenital anomalies may occur after later exposures [81]. On the other hand, some of the exposures recorded do not specify timing precisely and may be misattributed to the first trimester, although we verified timing for anomalies where significant associations were found.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…There was no information on dosage or length of exposure to SSRIsBerard et al [37] suggested that the teratogenic effect of paroxetine may be limited to higher doses (25mg/day). We assumed, as is customary, that the relevant exposure window was the first trimester (as these are the available EUROCAT data) but this window is wider than the sensitive period for many congenital anomalies, some congenital anomalies may occur after later exposures [81]. On the other hand, some of the exposures recorded do not specify timing precisely and may be misattributed to the first trimester, although we verified timing for anomalies where significant associations were found.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Detrimental effects of prenatal exposure to fever might be diluted if too-broad time intervals of exposure are used in the analyses. Czeizel et al 61 suggested that future research in this area should consider critical exposure periods as specific as possible to the outcome of interest and not rely only on commonly used indicators of time, such as trimesters. We found most evidence to support a harmful effect of fever in the early stages of pregnancy.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second time interval was the second and third months of gestation. This is the sensitive 'critical period' for most major CAs [Czeizel et al 2008]. The third time interval was the fourth to ninth months of gestation, that is, pregnancy after the organforming period.…”
Section: Collection and Evaluation Of Exposures And Confoundersmentioning
confidence: 99%