1992
DOI: 10.1016/0923-2508(92)90019-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of specific oligonucleotides for direct enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes in food samples by colony hybridization and rapid detection by PCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
1
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
38
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, hlyA and inlA in twent L. monocytogenes were positive, which is more than other report (91.7%) (20). The positive CAMP and haemolysis assay and the presence of hlyA and inlA genes by PCR in all positive isolates suggest that these virulent strains may have the potential to invade host cells and cause listeriosis (21). The results obtained have confirmed that the environment is a source of potentially pathogenic L. monocytogenes strains that carry a basic set of virulence genes and have the potential for invading the host epithelial cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In the present study, hlyA and inlA in twent L. monocytogenes were positive, which is more than other report (91.7%) (20). The positive CAMP and haemolysis assay and the presence of hlyA and inlA genes by PCR in all positive isolates suggest that these virulent strains may have the potential to invade host cells and cause listeriosis (21). The results obtained have confirmed that the environment is a source of potentially pathogenic L. monocytogenes strains that carry a basic set of virulence genes and have the potential for invading the host epithelial cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In the present work we compared two molecular detection methods, one immunoenzymatic and the other PCR based, specific for L. monocytogenes with the standard culture method ISO 11290-1. Studies on the application of PCR detection in naturally contaminated food are very scarce, but nevertheless the reliability and stability of the PCR approach compared with culture methods has been underlined (Bohnert et al, 1992;Niederhauser et al, 1992Niederhauser et al, , 1993. In addition, as we have demonstrated before (Aznar and Alarcón, 2003), there are multiple factors affecting the sensitivity of PCR detection of L. monocytogenes which complicates the comparison with the results obtained in other works.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…After centrifugation (10 min at 10 000 g), 5 µL of the supernatant was subjected to PCR. PCR amplification of a fragment internal to hly of 388 bp, the Listeria monocytogenes gene coding for listeriolysin O, was performed using primers G0 (5' GAA-TGT-AAA-CTT-CGG-CGC-AAT-CAG-3') and D0 (5' GCC-GTC-GAT-GAT-TTG-AAC-TTC-ATC-3'), shown by Bohnert et al [7] to be specific for Listeria monocytogenes. The reaction mixture contained 10× PCR buffer, 2.5 mM of each dNTP, 25 µM of each primer, 5 µL of the DNA preparation and 0.1 U of HotGoldStar DNA polymerase (Eurogentec) in a total volume of 50 µL.…”
Section: Mouse Virulence Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%