2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.undsp.2019.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of soft computing techniques for tunneling optimization of tunnel boring machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. Isam and Wengang [5] investigated the applications of soft computing techniques in TBM performance prediction, and concluded that soft computing methods shows good performance in dealing with complex relationships among TBM parameters.…”
Section: Literature Review a Data Analysis In Tbm And Tunnel Engmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…. Isam and Wengang [5] investigated the applications of soft computing techniques in TBM performance prediction, and concluded that soft computing methods shows good performance in dealing with complex relationships among TBM parameters.…”
Section: Literature Review a Data Analysis In Tbm And Tunnel Engmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As megaprojects with enormous uncertainties, tunnel construction needs to record data from every aspect and subsystem to reduce risk. The number of monitoring parameters can be more than one hundred, and the relationships among them are difficult to understand and model manually [5]. When critical parameters need to be predicted and analyzed, it is difficult to determine all related variables from the set of massive parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, machine learning has emerged as a promising technique for predictive assessment in geotechnical engineering, in general [25][26][27][28][29][30][31], and in tunnelling, in particular [32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Some promising research domains for machine learning in tunnelling are the geological prognosis ahead of the face, the interpretation of monitoring results, automation and maintenance [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some promising research domains for machine learning in tunnelling are the geological prognosis ahead of the face, the interpretation of monitoring results, automation and maintenance [32]. At present, however, research appears to be focussed on the following topics: prediction of TBM operational parameters [34,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46], penetration rate [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63], porewater pressure [64], ground settlement [65][66][67], disc cutter replacement [68][69][70], jamming risk [71,72] and geological classification [73][74][75][76]). Few authors estimated the face support pressure of TBMs with machine learning [35,52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%