“…Although this approach may be influenced by factors such as observer experience (Atkins et al, 2009), it is based on techniques that are widely available (Muzzi et al, 2003). In a recent consensus statement, the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine proposed that the traditional classification of heart failure (I, II, III, IV) based on the New York Heart Association classification could be complemented by a new one staging the progression of MVD in A, B, C and D. Then, group A was represented by those dogs that have hereditary predisposition but no signs of MVD and group B were those with MVD but no signs of CHF.…”