2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of seismic surface wave testing to assess track substructure condition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Laboratory tests measuring settlement and permanent axial strain also observed that ballast with dry fouling material exhibits similar settlement behavior as clean ballast [5,7], which is in agreement with seismic surface wave measurements [15]. For example, seismic surface wave tests show higher Young's Modulus values for dry fouled ballast than clean ballast because the dry fouling material fills the voids of the ballast yielding a stiffer material [15]. This suggests that dry fouled ballast may not require the same attention as wet fouled ballast unless the area is subject to precipitation.…”
Section: Laboratory Fouled Ballast Testingsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Laboratory tests measuring settlement and permanent axial strain also observed that ballast with dry fouling material exhibits similar settlement behavior as clean ballast [5,7], which is in agreement with seismic surface wave measurements [15]. For example, seismic surface wave tests show higher Young's Modulus values for dry fouled ballast than clean ballast because the dry fouling material fills the voids of the ballast yielding a stiffer material [15]. This suggests that dry fouled ballast may not require the same attention as wet fouled ballast unless the area is subject to precipitation.…”
Section: Laboratory Fouled Ballast Testingsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In general, increasing the moisture content of the fouling material decreases the laboratory [5] and field [15] measured strength and stiffness of the fouled ballast. For example, laboratory ballast box testing show significant increases in ballast settlement as clay-sized fouling material goes from dry to wet [5].…”
Section: Laboratory Fouled Ballast Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A wide review of non-destructive experimental methods with application to railway track-bed ballast is presented in [20]. The modern seismotomographic methods Spectral Analysis Surface Waves (SASW) and Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) [21], [22], which are used for subgrade diagnostics, are potentially applicable for investigation of ballast layer. Application of non-destructive methods, like ground-penetrating radar for monitoring of transport structures is presented in [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once a value is assumed for track modulus, the rail vertical deflection profile can be estimated using Equation ((1), and from the rail vertical deflection profile, Yrel can be calculated as the relative vertical deflection between the rail surface and the rail/wheel contact plane at a distance of 1.22 m from the nearest wheel ( Figure 1a) [11,30]. The main shortcoming in this method is that the Winkler model assumes a track modulus is constant along the track while the field data shows that a track modulus stochastically varies along the track [31,32]. Therefore, the estimation of the track modulus from the Yrel measurements needs more advanced numerical models.…”
Section: Winkler Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%