2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2007.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of rigid-body motion for the investigation and estimation of the measurement errors related to digital image correlation technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
117
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
117
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative displacements ∆L in x and y directions were calculated, after image calibration, at a mesh grid of 225 (15 × 15) points, with subset size of 61 × 61 pixels and 20 pixel overlapping. Relative displacements computed by means of infrared image correlation are influenced by unavoidable small rigid body translations [11] that occur during the thermal expansion of the test specimen, which was placed into the heating device without restraint. This effect must be corrected in order to get pure thermal expansion of the test specimen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative displacements ∆L in x and y directions were calculated, after image calibration, at a mesh grid of 225 (15 × 15) points, with subset size of 61 × 61 pixels and 20 pixel overlapping. Relative displacements computed by means of infrared image correlation are influenced by unavoidable small rigid body translations [11] that occur during the thermal expansion of the test specimen, which was placed into the heating device without restraint. This effect must be corrected in order to get pure thermal expansion of the test specimen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Errors related to the measurement setup and DIC technique (e.g. out-of-plane displacement/ focus, optical lens distortion; Bornert et al, 2009;Haddadi and Belhabib, 2008;Pan et al, 2009) can be considered relatively small due to proper sample alignment, small field of views analysed (o3 mm  1.5 mm) and large working distance (80 mm) between camera and object. The average local Green-Lagrangian shear strain of the three different skin strain profiles shown in Fig.…”
Section: Measurement Performance/uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, there is complex interplay between displacement error, strain error, and the parameters chosen for the speckle pattern, image correlation and strain calculation [1,3,4,[16][17][18][19][20]. Although several studies have attempted to quantify these relationships, most have been limited to correlation errors arising from rigid body translations [17,21] or no motion at all [4]. Simulated experiments in which displacements are applied numerically to a computer-generated image have also been conducted [3,18,19,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%