Use of passive sampling and high resolution mass spectrometry using a suspect screening approach to characterise emerging pollutants in contaminated groundwater and runoff

Pinasseau, Lucie; Wiest, Laure; Fildier, Aurélie; Volatier, Laurence; Fones, Gary R.; Mills, Graham A.; Mermillod‐Blondin, Florian; Vulliet, Emmanuelle

doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.489

Cited by 48 publications

(44 citation statements)

References 61 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Due to their ability to retain a large range of compounds with differing properties, two of the most commonly used EDs are SDB-RPS and SDB-XC. Our previous study [24] showed a similar performance of these two solid-phase sorbents for semi-polar and polar compounds, but our preliminary experiments showed slightly better and more repeatable recoveries for SDB-XC (data not shown When considering the overall mean recoveries, more than half of the compounds had a recovery above 80%. Three had a recovery above 60% and three (fluopyram, metholachlor and sulfamethoxazole) between 42 and 53% (Table 1).…”

Section: Empore™ Disk Performance and Recoveriesmentioning

confidence: 60%

“…Compounds selected for the study were considered to be ecotoxicologically relevant according to the literature [19][20][21][22][23] and were detected in GW in a previous study [24]. Table S1).…”

Section: Chemicalsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Field trials were undertaken in the eastern metropolitan area of Lyon (France) using twelve GW wells located in sites monitored in the framework of the field observatory in urban hydrology (OTHU, Marmonier et al [19], Pinasseau et al [24] and Voisin et al [32]).…”

Section: Field Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Calibration and field application of an innovative passive sampler for monitoring groundwater quality

Pinasseau

Wiest

Volatier

et al. 2020

Talanta

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study describes the development of a novel Empore™ disk-based passive sampler specially adapted to groundwater monitoring. The sampler was calibrated in the laboratory using conditions that corresponded to groundwater (i.e. matrix medium, water temperature, flow rate and water flow across the disks). The retention and elution performance for sixteen semi-polar and polar pollutants on the Empore™ disk (47 mm diameter, SDB-XC) was evaluated. Recoveries were ~ 80% for the majority of compounds. Sampler uptake kinetics were measured over fourteen days at three concentrations (10, 100 and 500 ng L-1) and the sampling rate (RS) calculated for four compounds. There was no influence of concentration of the test analyte on the uptake profile; with mean RS varying between 0.018 ± 0.007 L day-1 and 0.047 ± 0.001 L day-1. Passive samplers were deployed in twelve characterized groundwater wells near Lyon (France). Atrazine, atrazine-desethyl and diuron were the main pollutants found with a maximum time-weighted concentration of 61, 62and 127 ng L-1 respectively.

show abstract

Section: Empore™ Disk Performance and Recoveriesmentioning

confidence: 60%

Section: Chemicalsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Calibration and field application of an innovative passive sampler for monitoring groundwater quality

Pinasseau

Wiest

Volatier

et al. 2020

Talanta

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…12 types of pharmaceuticals (acetaminophen, atenolol (ATL), CAF, CBZ, ciprofloxacin, clofibric acid, diclofenac (DCF), hydrochlorothiazide, IBU, ketotifen (KTF), naproxen (NPX), and sulfamethoxazole (SMX)), three types of personal care products (DEET, triclocarban (TCC), and triclosan (TCS)), and five types of ASWs (acesulfame K, cyclamate, saccharine, aspartame, and sucralose) were identified in groundwater (being used as drinking water directly) at the Ganges River Basin (India) (Sharma et al, 2019). 16 pesticides and 14 pharmaceuticals were detected in groundwater in the eastern metropolitan area of Lyon (France), and among which, adenine, adenosine, and nicotinamide were detected for the first time (Pinasseau et al, 2019). Vystavna et al (2019) collected the data on hydrochemical parameters and stable isotopes of groundwater in urban and forest springs over a period of 12 months in the Kharkiv region (Ukraine) and found that the CECs detected in groundwater were various drugs (mainly CAF, nikethamide, riluzole, etc.…”

Section: Drinking Water and Groundwatermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Compared with polar organic chemical integrative sampler (POCIS), this sampler ANNUAL LITERATURE REVIEW did not have polyethersulfone (PES) diffusion membrane overlying the receiving phase, avoiding some compounds with higher hydrophobicity being trapped in the PES membrane and subsequently reducing the analytical sensitivity (Gao, Xu, Ma, Rao, & Wang, 2019). Pinasseau et al (2019) reported an Empore™ disk-based passive samplers, using SDB-RPS (styrene-divinylbenzene-reversed-phase sulfonate) and SDB-XC (poly(styrene-divinylbenzene)) as adsorbents, which have been considered to be able to trap hydrophobic and semi-polar compounds that might present in studied site. They designed a special deployment rig that comprised of stainless-steel inner mesh cylindrical cage with circular strengthening rods, and a similar size outer stainless-steel mesh to secure the Empore™ disks (passive samplers).…”

Section: Samplermentioning

confidence: 99%

Contaminants of emerging concern in aquatic environment: Occurrence, monitoring, fate, and risk assessment

Tang

Zhong

et al. 2020

Water Environment Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present work provides a review focusing on contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in aquatic environment, with an emphasis on their occurrence, monitoring, fate, and risk assessment in the research published in the scientific literature in 2019. Several studies revealed that these organic contaminants were detected in many water bodies and suspect, nontarget, and target screening provided an efficient detection for the co-existing organic substances with complex components. Wastewater resource recovery facilities were concurrently considered as a central source, and several specific chemicals have been found to be used as chemical markers to track the source of CECs in some urban watersheds. Reliable monitoring, reliable fate/toxicity assessment, and effective removal that consider CECs as a heterogeneous group rather than single substances will be the challenges for the research community in the future.

show abstract

Combination of different chromatographic and sampling modes for high-resolution mass spectrometric screening of organic microcontaminants in water

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Text S1: Chromatographic conditionsTable S1: List of chemicals included in the accurate mass MS/MS spectral library (included as a separate file) Table S2: Compounds identified in the effluent wastewater sample by the different sampling strategies (POCIS sorbent, POCIS membrane and spot water) injected in the four chromatographic modes (RPLC, HILIC, MMLC and SFC). Detections are coded as 1, while nondetections are coded as 0. Text S1: Chromatographic conditionsRPLC separation was carried out with a ZORBAX Extend-C18 1.8 µm (2.1 x 50 mm) column supplied by Agilent Technologies, connected to a Supelco ColumnSaver 0.5 µm Precolumn Filter (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The temperature at the column was fixed at 35 °C and a 2 µL aliquot of the sample was injected. As mobile phases, methanol (A) and water (B) both with 0.1% formic acid (pH 2.7) were used at flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. The gradient elution started with 98% A, increasing to 100% B in 22 min, held for 4 min. Subsequently, it returned to initial conditions (98% A) and was held for 4 min for column back-conditioning.HILIC separation was adapted from Schulze et al. [1] and carried out with an EC 150/2 NUCLEODUR HILIC 3 µm (2 x 150 mm) column supplied by Macherey Nagel (Düren, Germany), connected to a Supelco ColumnSaver 0.5 µm Precolumn Filter. The temperature at the column was fixed at 35 °C and a 2 µL aliquot of the sample was injected. As mobile phases, a mixture of water-acetonitrile (95:5 v/v) containing 5 mM ammonium formate (apparent pH 2.9) (A) and a mixture of acetonitrile-water (95:5 v/v) also with 5 mM ammonium formate (apparent pH 2.9) (B) were used at flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. The gradient elution started with 100% B, increasing to 50% A in 12 min, held for 8 min. Subsequently, it returned to initial conditions (100% B) and was held for 10 min for column back-conditioning.MMLC separation was carried out with an Acclaim Trinity P1 3 µm (2.1 x 50 mm) column supplied by Thermo Scientific (San Jose, CA, USA), connected to a Supelco ColumnSaver 0.5 µm Precolumn Filter, based on the work of Montes et al. [2] The temperature at the column was fixed at 35 °C and a 2 µL aliquot of the sample was injected. As mobile phases, a mixture of water-acetonitrile (98:2 v/v) with 5 mM ammonium acetate (apparent pH 5.5) (A) and a mixture of acetonitrile-water (80:20 v/v) with 20 mM ammonium acetate (apparent pH 5.5) (B) were used at flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. The gradient elution started with 98% A, increasing to 100% B in 10 min, held for 10 min. Subsequently, it returned to initial conditions (98% A) and was held for 10 min for column back-conditioning.SFC separation was carried out with a Torus DIOL 1.7 µm (3.0 x 100 mm) column supplied by Waters Corporation (Milford, MA, USA), connected to a Supelco ColumnSaver 0.5 µm Precolumn, adapting a protocol proposed by Schulze et al. [1]. The temperature at the column was fixed at 45 °C and a 2 µL aliquot of the sample was injected. As mobile phases, supercritical CO 2 (A) and methanol (0.2% ammonia) (B) were used at flow r...

show abstract

Use of passive sampling and high resolution mass spectrometry using a suspect screening approach to characterise emerging pollutants in contaminated groundwater and runoff

Cited by 48 publications

References 61 publications

Calibration and field application of an innovative passive sampler for monitoring groundwater quality

Calibration and field application of an innovative passive sampler for monitoring groundwater quality

Contaminants of emerging concern in aquatic environment: Occurrence, monitoring, fate, and risk assessment

Combination of different chromatographic and sampling modes for high-resolution mass spectrometric screening of organic microcontaminants in water

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About