1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf01956172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of mice for initial approximation of reentry intervals into pesticide-treated fields

Abstract: The possibility of using laboratory mice to obtain information relative to establishment of reentry intervals for pesticide-treated fields was investigated. Pre-and postexposure blood cholinesterase levels of mice exposed for 10 hours to insecticidetreated (field applications) tobacco, cotton, or apple leaves were determined at 24 hour intervals. Differences were found between insecticides with respect to both initial inhibition and residuality as well as different types of foliage, rates of application, and f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The responses of mice exposed to 24 and 48 h field residues of parathion, methyl parathion, and azinphos-methyl on tobacco leaves (Guthrie et al, 1974) were roughly in the same range as those of unprotected animals in the present studies, and the relative potencies were similar.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The responses of mice exposed to 24 and 48 h field residues of parathion, methyl parathion, and azinphos-methyl on tobacco leaves (Guthrie et al, 1974) were roughly in the same range as those of unprotected animals in the present studies, and the relative potencies were similar.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Increased persistence in the field was also reported by Guthrie et al (1974); however, a lower cholinesterase response was seen for the encapsulated formulation of methyl parathion than the EC formulation. In the present work, methyl parathion EC was roughly equivalent in potency to its encapsulated counterpart.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations