2018
DOI: 10.5599/admet.6.1.430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of low-field NMR for the characterization of gels and biological tissues

Abstract: The focus of this paper is on the theoretical interpretation of Low Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (LF-NMR) data regarding hydrogels architecture and on the most interesting applications of LF-NMR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The NMR signal attenuation after the pulsed gradient is dependent on the diffusion coefficient of the molecule [10]. It can be exploited to study the dynamics of polymers in solution or inside porous materials [11,12]. Although interesting for polymer characterization, these two techniques will not be further addressed in this review, since we decided to deal with the basic equipment for LF-TD-NMR in the characterization of polymeric items.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NMR signal attenuation after the pulsed gradient is dependent on the diffusion coefficient of the molecule [10]. It can be exploited to study the dynamics of polymers in solution or inside porous materials [11,12]. Although interesting for polymer characterization, these two techniques will not be further addressed in this review, since we decided to deal with the basic equipment for LF-TD-NMR in the characterization of polymeric items.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second component, with signals in the range of 10–100 ms refers to immobilized water, while the signals with the longest relaxation time (100–1000 ms) are considered to be due to free water. 58…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The irradiation time and polymer concentration are expected to affect both the hydrogen relaxation time ( T 2m ) and the polymeric network mesh size (ξ). Indeed, it is well known [25,26,27] that the average value of the inverse relaxation time (1/ T 2 ) m (see Equation (6)) referring to hydrogens belonging to water molecules trapped in the polymeric network is related to the polymer volume fraction, φ, and ξ, by the following equation: (1T2)m=1T2H2O+2Msans-serifξC0C1 10.58φφwhere T 2H2O is the relaxation time of the free water hydrogens (≈ 3008 ms at 25 °C, 20 MHz [28]), i.e., the relaxation time of water hydrogens in the absence of polymer network. scriptM is a parameter, called relaxivity, representing the ratio between the thickness and the relaxation time of the water layer close to polymeric chains (bound water layer) while C 0 and C 1 are two constants that, for a cubical network, are equal to 1 and 3π, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inverse linear correlation between T 2m and φ is theoretically correct as the φ increase implies the increase of the solid surface, represented by the polymeric chains’ surface, in contact with the water molecules. In turn, the solid surface is responsible for faster hydrogen relaxation [27]. On the contrary, the absence of a correlation between ξ and φ and between T 2m and ξ simply states that, whatever φ, the mesh size is almost constant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation