2011
DOI: 10.3103/s1068367411030098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of LOD score technology in mapping quantitative trait loci in plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…), which are explained by the QTL data, for each trait and population, was performed using the MAPQTL 6.0 [37]. The significance of each LOD was established by a permutation test (1000 repetitions) [38]. The correlation coefficient "trait-marker" was calculated for the 95% significance level as a statistically significant linkage of the marker locus with the QTL, which determines the studied trait, based on the empirically obtained variances for each pair of trait-marker [39].…”
Section: Statistical Processing Of the Obtained Results And Qtl Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), which are explained by the QTL data, for each trait and population, was performed using the MAPQTL 6.0 [37]. The significance of each LOD was established by a permutation test (1000 repetitions) [38]. The correlation coefficient "trait-marker" was calculated for the 95% significance level as a statistically significant linkage of the marker locus with the QTL, which determines the studied trait, based on the empirically obtained variances for each pair of trait-marker [39].…”
Section: Statistical Processing Of the Obtained Results And Qtl Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the critical value 3 will correspond to the maximum value of the type I error (at p < 0.001), and if a very high particular (individual) type I error is selected, for example 5%, then a high level of cohesion will be reliably found randomly. At the same time, both major and minor QTLs are often localized in the same positions in different experiments and even in different years of experiments; therefore, an LOD score below 3 can also be taken into account [38]. It is also likely that the low LOD score for some of the identified QTLs is due to statistical reasons (limited sample size), since only lines adapted to light culture conditions were included in the estimate.…”
Section: Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping (Qtl Analysis)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, the CIM Zmapqtl module model 6 with a window size of 10 cM and the 5 markers for the background control were used (Wang et al 2012). QTLs were identified using LOD score of C 3 as the threshold (probability of 1000-1) (Kocherina et al 2011). The proportion of observed phenotypic variation explained (PVE) due to a particular QTL was estimated by the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) using maximum likelihood approach (Basten et al 1994).…”
Section: Composite Interval Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), которые объясняются соответствующим QTL, для каждой изоформы эстеразы в каждой популяции. Значимость LOD устанавливали в тесте пермутации (1000 повторений) (36).…”
unclassified