2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.endoen.2016.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of lanreotide in combination with cabergoline or pegvisomant in patients with acromegaly in the clinical practice: The ACROCOMB study

Abstract: Uso de lanreotida en combinación con cabergolina o pegvisomant en la práctica clínica en pacientes con acromegalia: el estudio ACROCOMB

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the 2018 consensus statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes recommends that an increase of dose and/or dose frequency of first-generation somatostatin analog or the addition of cabergoline may be considered in patients having a partial response [6]. Other options for treatment optimization include switching to pasireotide LAR or pegvisomant or combination with pegvisomant [6,51]. In our study, physicians opted for combination of lanreotide autogel with dopamine agonists in 17.1 % and with pegvisomant in 6.6 % of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the 2018 consensus statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes recommends that an increase of dose and/or dose frequency of first-generation somatostatin analog or the addition of cabergoline may be considered in patients having a partial response [6]. Other options for treatment optimization include switching to pasireotide LAR or pegvisomant or combination with pegvisomant [6,51]. In our study, physicians opted for combination of lanreotide autogel with dopamine agonists in 17.1 % and with pegvisomant in 6.6 % of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the available data in the literature, combination treatment of CAB with first-generation SRLs seems to result in higher rates of disease control than monotherapy, [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][33][34][35][36][37] which is an interesting option in patients who are not totally controlled with SRL. We have previously reviewed the literature and found a control rate of 34%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%