First-generation somatostatin receptors ligands (SRL) are the mainstay in the medical treatment of acromegaly, however the percentage of patients controlled with these drugs significantly varies in the different studies. Many factors are involved in the resistance to SRL. In this review, we update the physiology of somatostatin and its receptors (sst), the use of SRL in the treatment of acromegaly and the factors involved in the response to these drugs. The SRL act through interaction with the sst, which up to now have been characterized as five subtypes. The first-generation SRL, octreotide and lanreotide, are considered sst2 specific and have biochemical response rates varying from 20 to 70%. Tumor volume reduction can be found in 36-75% of patients. Several factors may determine the response to these drugs, such as sst, AIP, E-cadherin, ZAC1, filamin A and β-arrestin expression in the somatotropinomas. In patients resistant to first-generation SRL, alternative medical treatment options include: SRL high dose regimens, SRL in combination with cabergoline or pegvisomant, or the use of pasireotide. Pasireotide is a next-generation SRL with a broader pattern of interaction with sst. In the light of the recent increase of treatment options in acromegaly and the deeper knowledge of the determinants of response to the current first-line therapy, a shift from a trial-and-error treatment to a personalized one could be possible.
Background: Some pituitary adenomas exhibit fast growth and invade surrounding structures. To date, there is no robust marker to predict invasiveness. Aim: To evaluate Ki-67, p53 and aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) expression and compare these between invasive and noninvasive somatotropinomas and nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs). Methods: Protein expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. Tumors were classified according to percentage of immunolabeled nuclei for Ki-67 and p53. AIP immunopositivity was graded according to a score encompassing pattern and intensity. Invasiveness was defined according to radiological and surgical criteria. Results: Thirty-eight sporadic somatotropinomas were studied. Median Ki-67 labeling index in invasive and noninvasive tumors was 1.6 (range 0–20.6) and 0.26 (0–2.2), respectively (p = 0.01). With a 2.3% cut-off point obtained by ROC curve analysis, invasive adenomas were distinguished with 100% specificity, 39% sensitivity, and 63% accuracy. Low AIP expression was also correlated with tumor invasiveness (p = 0.001), with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 78, 80, and 79%, respectively. Expression of p53 was not different among tumors. Twenty-nine NFPAs were studied, with no significant difference between Ki-67, p53 and AIP expression in invasive and noninvasive tumors. High AIP expression was more frequent in NFPAs, with Ki-67 >3% (p = 0.051), especially when only gonadotrope cell adenomas (n = 25) were considered (p = 0.012). Conclusions: These data suggest, for the first time, that AIP is a better marker of invasiveness in somatotropinomas than Ki-67 and p53. In addition, low AIP expression is observed in invasive somatotropinomas, in contrast with high AIP expression in NFPAs (mainly gonadotrope cell tumors) with high proliferative indices.
Acromegaly is associated with high morbidity and elevated mortality when not adequately treated. Surgery is the first-line treatment for most patients as it is the only one that can lead to immediate cure. In patients who are not cured by surgery, treatment is currently based on a trial-and-error approach. Firstgeneration somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRL) are initiated for most patients, although approximately 25% of patients present resistance to this drug class. Some biomarkers of treatment outcome are described in the literature, with the aim of categorizing patients into different groups to individualize their treatments using a personalized approach. In this review, we will discuss the current status of precision medicine for the treatment of acromegaly and future perspectives on the use of personalized medicine for this purpose.
In conclusion, DR2 is expressed in all adenomas and the majority of the patients in this study displayed tumour shrinkage on cabergoline (CAB) therapy. Thus, CAB might be useful in adjuvant therapy in NFPA patients with residual tumours after surgery.
Pituitary apoplexy is an uncommon event, occurring due to the infarction and/or haemorrhage usually of a previously unknown pituitary adenoma. It can occur in all adenoma subtypes but is more common in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. The physiopathology is not completely clear, and precipitating factors, such as major surgeries, anticoagulant use or pituitary dynamic tests, can be found in up to 40% of patients. The clinical presentation is characterized by a rapid onset with a headache as the main symptom, but visual disturbances can also be present as well as meningism and intracranial hypertension. The diagnosis is based on imaging evaluations, mainly using magnetic resonance imaging, which can show various patterns depending on the timeframe following the occurrence of the apoplectic event. Pituitary hormonal deficits are also common, and the evaluation of hormonal levels is mandatory. Pituitary apoplexy can be managed by surgery or conservative treatment, and a multidisciplinary team is essential for the decision-making process. The outcome is usually positive with both surgical and conservative approaches, but surveillance is needed due to the risk of re-bleeding or tumour recurrence.
Cavernous sinus invasion is the only preoperative predictor of surgical remission. GH at 48 h and IGF-I one week after surgery can define earlier not cured patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.