2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2012.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of landfill leachate as a carbon source in a sulfidogenic fluidized-bed reactor for the treatment of synthetic acid mine drainage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cirik et al and Sahinkaya et al [19,20] have studied sulfate removal, including metal precipitation, from synthetic AMD in batch reactors and fluidized bed reactors, respectively. The first work reported pH elevation from 4.0 to 8.0 and 100% of chromium removal by sulfide precipitation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cirik et al and Sahinkaya et al [19,20] have studied sulfate removal, including metal precipitation, from synthetic AMD in batch reactors and fluidized bed reactors, respectively. The first work reported pH elevation from 4.0 to 8.0 and 100% of chromium removal by sulfide precipitation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the literature, the kinetic constants obtained in this study are higher than those previously reported under similar, but not identical conditions. [19,20] In this case, the cited reports presented operating conditions that did not include either a low initial pH or the addition of metals. In contrast, our results agree with another report from Camiloti et al, [21] in which copper is added under neutral conditions.…”
Section: Kinetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best way to reduce the mobility of heavy metals is to transform them into insoluble compounds such as sulfides, which are more stable forms. It has been reported that certain heavy metals such as Cr (VI) may be reduced under sulfate reducing conditions (Singh et al, 2011;Sahinkaya et al, 2013;Cirik et al, 2013). Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) under anaerobic conditions oxidize simple organic compounds (such as acetic acid and lactic acid) by utilizing sulfate as an electron acceptor and generate hydrogen sulfide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, a better alternative would be to extract the soluble organics from MSW in a liquid stream and feed this through to a sulfate-reducing reactor. Studies have proposed landfill 3 leachate as a source of soluble organic carbon for SRB (Sahinkaya et al, 2013), however the leachate from landfills is typically dominated by refractory organics and low concentrations of available soluble organics, which has resulted in poor sulfate reduction rates in these studies.…”
Section: Thesis Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up until now, only Sahinkaya et al (2013) has investigated the effectiveness of landfill leachate as an electron donor for active sulfate reduction. Biological sulfate reduction rates of 0.90 g SO4 2 /L/day were reported for landfill leachate with 2 g COD/L (Sahinkaya et al, 2013), although only 30-40% of the COD was directed to sulfate reduction compared to 70% with ethanol.…”
Section: Sulfate Reduction With Landfill Leachatementioning
confidence: 99%