2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.wsj.2015.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biogenic sulfides for sequestration of Cr (VI), COD and sulfate from synthetic wastewater

Abstract: The aim of this work is to explore the possibility of using mixed culture of mesophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) for retrieval of toxic and carcinogenic Cr (VI) from synthetic solution. In order to treat Cr (VI) containing wastewater effectively, SRB culture was adapted to 50 mg/L Cr (VI) and maintained through repeated sub-culturing to enhance the growth and activity of SRB. Batch biosorption experiments were carried out in glass serum vials by cultured SRB, accomplishing the removal of 82.1% Cr (VI), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chromium appeared relatively less toxic to the SRB than copper as bioprecipitation and sulphate uptake were even noted at higher concentrations (15 ppm) in this case. This finding was consistent with the previous literature values for toxic concentrations, which were lower for copper than chromium (Cabrera et al 2006 ; Ahmadi et al 2015 ; Verma et al 2015 ). The reason for this difference in cell deactivation could be due to interactions with the bacterial cultures, although further investigations into the exact mechanisms are required to obtain a deeper understanding of this phenomenon as reported earlier by Cabrera et al ( 2006 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Chromium appeared relatively less toxic to the SRB than copper as bioprecipitation and sulphate uptake were even noted at higher concentrations (15 ppm) in this case. This finding was consistent with the previous literature values for toxic concentrations, which were lower for copper than chromium (Cabrera et al 2006 ; Ahmadi et al 2015 ; Verma et al 2015 ). The reason for this difference in cell deactivation could be due to interactions with the bacterial cultures, although further investigations into the exact mechanisms are required to obtain a deeper understanding of this phenomenon as reported earlier by Cabrera et al ( 2006 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For inoculation pH ~ 5, however, the observed sulfate removal (~21 mmol) was significant based on the AMD sulfate concentration (~16 mmol). Sulfate removal values at pH 5 (41%) and pH 7 (44%), similar to that in this study, were demonstrated by Verma et al (2015). At pH 5, Jong and Parry (2006) also obtained sulfate reduction values similar to that in this experiment (43%).…”
Section: Phase 2: Performance and Microbial Communities Of The Lac Esupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Marques et al investigated the removal of chromium and lead (80 and 200 ppm) with SRB and reached an e ciency of 90% in chromium removal and 65% in lead removal after 180 hours. Verma et al investigated the removal of 50 mg/ L Cr (VI), sulfate, and COD in SRB environment with a retention time of 7 days, pH of 7, at 37°C and achieved 76%, 77% and 87% removal of chromium, sulfate, and COD, respectively [22]. The obtained results shows that the biological adaptation time was lower than the other simmilar biological process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%